A Comparative Visual Analytics Framework for Evaluating Evolutionary Processes in Multi-Objective Optimization
Yansong Huang, Zherui Zhang, Ao Jiao, Yuxin Ma, Ran Cheng
Abstract
Evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) algorithms have been demonstrated to be effective in solving multi-criteria decision-making problems. In real-world applications, analysts often employ several algorithms concurrently and compare their solution sets to gain insight into the characteristics of different algorithms and explore a broader range of feasible solutions. However, EMO algorithms are typically treated as black boxes, leading to difficulties in performing detailed analysis and comparisons between the internal evolutionary processes. Inspired by the successful application of visual analytics tools in explainable AI, we argue that interactive visualization can significantly enhance the comparative analysis between multiple EMO algorithms. In this paper, we present a visual analytics framework that enables the exploration and comparison of evolutionary processes in EMO algorithms. Guided by a literature review and expert interviews, the proposed framework addresses various analytical tasks and establishes a multi-faceted visualization design to support the comparative analysis of intermediate generations in the evolution as well as solution sets. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework through case studies on benchmarking and real-world multi-objective optimization problems to elucidate how analysts can leverage our framework to inspect and compare diverse algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dcb40c4e-5016-4960-9674-bec1caaffdeaCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- A distributional view on multi-objective policy optimizationAbbas Abdolmaleki, Sandy H. Huang, Leonard Hasenclever, Michael Neunert et al.ICML 2020 · 93 citations
- Towards Better Bus Networks: A Visual Analytics ApproachDi Weng, Chengbo Zheng, Zikun Deng, Mingze Ma et al.IEEE VIS 2020 · 74 citations
- Evaluation of Sampling Methods for ScatterplotsJun Yuan, Shouxing Xiang, Jiazhi Xia, Lingyun Yu et al.IEEE VIS 2020 · 50 citations
- PipelineProfiler: A Visual Analytics Tool for the Exploration of AutoML PipelinesJorge Piazentin Ono, Sonia Castelo, Roque Lopez, Enrico Bertini et al.IEEE VIS 2020 · 49 citations
- A Visual Analytics Framework for Explaining and Diagnosing Transfer Learning ProcessesYuxin Ma, Arlen Fan, Jingrui He, Arun Reddy Nelakurthi et al.IEEE VIS 2020 · 36 citations
Related papers
- EVM: Incorporating Model Checking into Exploratory Visual AnalysisAlex Kale, Ziyang Guo, Xiaoli Qiao, Jeffrey Heer et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 16 citations
- VIME: Visual Interactive Model Explorer for Identifying Capabilities and Limitations of Machine Learning Models for Sequential Decision-MakingAnindya Das Antar, Somayeh Molaei, Yan-Ying Chen, Matthew L. Lee et al.UIST 2024 · 3 citations
- Exploring the Robustness of the Effect of EVO on Intention Valuation Through ReplicationYesugen Baatartogtokh, Kaitlyn Cook, Alicia M. GrubbICSE 2025 · 1 citation
- HypoML: Visual Analysis for Hypothesis-based Evaluation of Machine Learning ModelsQianwen Wang, William Alexander, Jack Pegg, Huamin Qu et al.IEEE VIS 2020 · 17 citations
- Interactive Explainable RankingChao Zhang, Abe DavisCHI 2026 · 1 citation
