On Worst-Case Learning in Relativized Heuristica
Shuichi Hirahara, Mikito Nanashima
Abstract
A PAC learning model involves two worst-case requirements: a learner must learn all functions in a class on all example distributions. However, basing the hardness of learning on NP-hardness has remained a key challenge for decades. In fact, recent progress in computational complexity suggests the possibility that a weaker assumption might be sufficient for worst-case learning than the feasibility of worst-case algorithms for NP problems. In this study, we investigate whether these worst-case re-quirements for learning are satisfied on the basis of only average-case assumptions in order to understand the nature of learning. First, we construct a strong worst-case learner based on the assumption that DistNP ⊆ AvgP, i.e., in Heuristica. Our learner agnostically learns all polynomial-size circuits on all unknown P/ poly-samplable distributions in polynomial time, where the complexity of learning depends on the complexity of sampling examples. Second, we study the limitation of relativizing constructions of learners based on average-case heuristic algorithms. Specifically, we construct a powerful oracle such that DistPH ⊆ AvgP, i.e., every problem in PH is easy on average, whereas UP ∩ coUP and PAC learning on almost-uniform distributions are hard even for 2n/w(1og n)- time algorithms in the relativized world, which improves the oracle separation presented by Impagliazzo (CCC 2011). The core concept of our improvements is the consideration of a switching lemma on a large alphabet, which may be of independent interest. The lower bound on the time complexity is nearly optimal because Hirahara (STOC 2021) showed that DistPH ⊆ AvgP implies that PH can be solved in time 2O(n/ log n)under any relativized world. The full version of this paper is available on ECCC [1].
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- NP-Hardness of Learning Programs and Partial MCSPShuichi HiraharaFOCS 2022 · 24 citations
- Capturing One-Way Functions via NP-Hardness of Meta-ComplexityShuichi HiraharaSTOC 2023 · 9 citations
- SAT Reduces to the Minimum Circuit Size Problem with a Random OracleRahul IlangoFOCS 2023 · 7 citations
- Beating Brute Force for Compression ProblemsShuichi Hirahara, Rahul Ilango, R. Ryan WilliamsSTOC 2024 · 3 citations
- NP-hardness of the Minimum Circuit Size Problem from Well-Studied AssumptionsShuichi Hirahara, Rahul IlangoFOCS 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on1
Related papers
- Computational-Statistical Tradeoffs from NP-hardnessGuy Blanc, Caleb Koch, Carmen Strassle, Li-Yang TanFOCS 2025 · 2 citations
- Learning in Pessiland via Inductive InferenceShuichi Hirahara, Mikito NanashimaFOCS 2023 · 11 citations
- Properly learning decision trees with queries is NP-hardCaleb Koch, Carmen Strassle, Li-Yang TanFOCS 2023 · 2 citations
- Hardness of learning DNFs using halfspacesSuprovat Ghoshal, Rishi SaketSTOC 2021
- Collaborative Learning with Different Labeling FunctionsYuyang Deng, Mingda QiaoICML 2024 · 2 citations
