CoCoLoFa: A Dataset of News Comments with Common Logical Fallacies Written by LLM-Assisted Crowds
Min-Hsuan Yeh, Ruyuan Wan, Ting-Hao K. Huang
Abstract
Detecting logical fallacies in texts can help users spot argument flaws, but automating this detection is not easy. Manually annotating fallacies in large-scale, real-world text data to create datasets for developing and validating detection models is costly. This paper introduces COCOLOFA, the largest known English logical fallacy dataset, containing 7,706 comments for 648 news articles, with each comment labeled for fallacy presence and type. We recruited 143 crowd workers to write comments embodying specific fallacy types (e.g., slippery slope) in response to news articles. Recognizing the complexity of this writing task, we built an LLM-powered assistant into the workers' interface to aid in drafting and refining their comments. Experts rated the writing quality and labeling validity of COCOLOFA as high and reliable. BERT-based models fine-tuned using COCOLOFA achieved the highest fallacy detection (F1=0.86) and classification (F1=0.87) performance on its test set, outperforming the stateof-the-art LLMs. Our work shows that combining crowdsourcing and LLMs enables us to more effectively construct datasets for complex linguistic phenomena that crowd workers find challenging to produce on their own. COCOLOFA is public at CoCoLoFa.org/.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dc9d5bd8-6ed0-4282-a889-6718ebe2e838Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on3
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Multitask Instruction-based Prompting for Fallacy RecognitionTariq Alhindi, Tuhin Chakrabarty, Elena Musi, Smaranda MuresanEMNLP 2022 · 16 citations
- Breaking Down the Invisible Wall of Informal Fallacies in Online DiscussionsSaumya Sahai, Oana Balalau, Roxana HorincarACL 2021
Related papers
- Socrates or Smartypants: Testing Logic Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models with Logic Programming-Based Test OraclesZihao Xu, Junchen Ding, Yiling Lou, Kun Zhang et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Are LLMs Better than Reported? Detecting Label Errors and Mitigating Their Effect on Model PerformanceOmer Nahum, Nitay Calderon, Orgad Keller, Idan Szpektor et al.EMNLP 2025 · 9 citations
- Truth or Sophistry? LoFa: A Benchmark for LLM Robustness Against Logical FallaciesXudong Shen, Li Yuan, Ye Chen, Xin Wu et al.ACL 2026
- Are LLMs Good Zero-Shot Fallacy Classifiers?Fengjun Pan, Xiaobao Wu, Zongrui Li, Anh Tuan LuuEMNLP 2024 · 7 citations
- A Large-Scale Dataset for Argument Quality Ranking: Construction and AnalysisShai Gretz, Roni Friedman, Edo Cohen-Karlik, Assaf Toledo et al.AAAI 2020 · 148 citations
