MoSS: Modular Security Specifications Framework
Amir Herzberg, Hemi Leibowitz, Ewa Syta, Sara Wrótniak
Abstract
Applied cryptographic protocols have to meet a rich set of security requirements under diverse environments and against diverse adversaries. However, currently used security specifications, based on either simulation (e.g., `ideal functionality' in UC) or games, are monolithic, combining together different aspects of protocol requirements, environment and assumptions. Such security specifications are complex, error-prone, and foil reusability, modular analysis and incremental design.
We present the Modular Security Specifications (MoSS) framework, which cleanly separates the security requirements (goals) which a protocol should achieve, from the models (assumptions) under which each requirement should be ensured. This modularity allows us to reuse individual models and requirements across different protocols and tasks, and to compare protocols for the same task, either under different assumptions or satisfying different sets of requirements. MoSS is flexible and extendable, e.g., it can support both asymptotic and concrete definitions for security.
So far, we confirmed the applicability of MoSS to two applications: secure broadcast protocols and PKI schemes.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get dc880368-4f73-476a-b0c9-32ce56271b4bCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- AUC: Accountable Universal ComposabilityMike Graf, Ralf Küsters, Daniel RauschS&P 2023
- Quantifying the Security Cost of Migrating Protocols to PracticeChristopher Patton, Thomas ShrimptonCRYPTO 2020 · 2 citations
- Provable Security for PKI SchemesSara Wrótniak, Hemi Leibowitz, Ewa Syta, Amir HerzbergCCS 2024 · 4 citations
- A Framework for Universally Composable Diffie-Hellman Key ExchangeRalf Küsters, Daniel RauschS&P 2017 · 21 citations
- Cryptis: Cryptographic Reasoning in Separation LogicArthur Azevedo de Amorim, Amal Ahmed, Marco GaboardiPOPL 2026 · 1 citation
