(Noisy) Gap Cycle Counting Strikes Back: Random Order Streaming Lower Bounds for Connected Components and Beyond
Sepehr Assadi, Janani Sundaresan
Abstract
We continue the study of the communication complexity of gap cycle counting problems. These problems have been introduced by Verbin and Yu [SODA 2011] and have found numerous applications in proving streaming lower bounds. In the noisy gap cycle counting problem (NGC), there is a small integer k 1 and an n-vertex graph consisted of vertex-disjoint union of either k-cycles or 2k-cycles, plus O(n/k) disjoint paths of length k -1 in both cases ("noise"). The edges of this graph are partitioned between Alice and Bob whose goal is to decide which case the graph belongs to with minimal communication from Alice to Bob. We study the robust communication complexity-à la Chakrabarti, Cormode, and McGregor [STOC 2008]-of NGC, namely, when edges are partitioned randomly between the players. This is in contrast to all prior work on gap cycle counting problems in adversarial partitions. While NGC can be solved trivially with zero communication when k < log n, we prove that when k is a constant factor larger than log n, the robust (one-way) communication complexity of NGC is Ω(n) bits. As a corollary of this result, we can prove several new graph streaming lower bounds for random order streams. In particular, we show that any streaming algorithm that for every ǫ > 0 estimates the number of connected components of a graph presented in a random order stream to within an ǫ • n additive factor requires 2 Ω(1/ǫ) space, settling a conjecture of Peng and Sohler [SODA 2018]. We further discuss new implications of our lower bounds to other problems such as estimating size of maximum matchings and independent sets on planar graphs, random walks, as well as to stochastic streams.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dc6cf48d-8b03-413f-9b67-74dab3fc47a8Cited by top-tier papers3
- Approximability of all finite CSPs with linear sketchesChi-Ning Chou, Alexander Golovnev, Madhu Sudan, Santhoshini VelusamyFOCS 2021 · 5 citations
- Hidden Permutations to the Rescue: Multi-Pass Streaming Lower Bounds for Approximate MatchingsSepehr Assadi, Janani SundaresanFOCS 2023 · 3 citations
- Approximating the Top Eigenvector in Random Order StreamsPraneeth Kacham, David P. WoodruffNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
Builds on7
- Space Efficient Approximation to Maximum Matching Size from Uniform Edge SamplesMichael Kapralov, Slobodan Mitrovic, Ashkan Norouzi-Fard, Jakab TardosSODA 2020 · 30 citations
- Multi-Pass Graph Streaming Lower Bounds for Cycle Counting, MAX-CUT, Matching Size, and Other ProblemsSepehr Assadi, Gillat Kol, Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Huacheng YuFOCS 2020 · 19 citations
- Graph streaming lower bounds for parameter estimation and property testing via a streaming XOR lemmaSepehr Assadi, Vishvajeet NSTOC 2021 · 12 citations
- Streaming complexity of CSPs with randomly ordered constraintsRaghuvansh R. Saxena, Noah Singer, Madhu Sudan, Santhoshini VelusamySODA 2023 · 7 citations
- Towards Multi-Pass Streaming Lower Bounds for Optimal Approximation of Max-CutLijie Chen, Gillat Kol, Dmitry Paramonov, Raghuvansh R. Saxena et al.SODA 2023 · 3 citations
Related papers
- Factorial Lower Bounds for (Almost) Random Order StreamsAshish Chiplunkar, John Kallaugher, Michael Kapralov, Eric PriceFOCS 2022
- Streaming Lower Bounds and Asymmetric Set-DisjointnessShachar Lovett, Jiapeng ZhangFOCS 2023 · 3 citations
- The Quantum and Classical Streaming Complexity of Quantum and Classical Max-CutJohn Kallaugher, Ojas ParekhFOCS 2022 · 1 citation
- Near-Optimal Four-Cycle Counting in Graph StreamsSebastian Lüderssen, Stefan Neumann, Pan PengSODA 2026 · 1 citation
- Triangle and Four Cycle Counting with Predictions in Graph StreamsJustin Y. Chen, Talya Eden, Piotr Indyk, Honghao Lin et al.ICLR 2022 · 29 citations
