Inference-time optimization for experiment-grounded protein ensemble generation
Sai Advaith Maddipatla, Anar Rzayev, Marco Pegoraro, Martin Pacesa, Paul Schanda, Ailie Marx, Sanketh Vedula, Alexander Bronstein
Abstract
Protein function relies on dynamic conformational ensembles, yet current generative models like AlphaFold3 (AF3) often fail to produce ensembles that match experimental data. Recent experiment-guided generators attempt to address this by steering the reverse diffusion process. However, these methods are limited by fixed sampling horizons and sensitivity to initialization, often yielding thermodynamically implausible results. We introduce a general inference-time optimization framework to solve these challenges. First, we optimize over latent representations to maximize ensemble log-likelihood, rather than perturbing structures post hoc. This approach eliminates dependence on diffusion length, removes initialization bias, and easily incorporates external constraints. Second, we present novel sampling schemes for drawing Boltzmann-weighted ensembles. By combining structural priors from AF3 with force-field–based priors, we sample from their product distribution while balancing experimental likelihoods. Our results show that this framework consistently outperforms state-of-the-art guidance, improving diversity, physical energy, and agreement with data in X-ray crystallography and NMR, sometimes fitting the experimental data better than deposited PDB structures. Finally, inference-time optimization experiments maximizing iPTM scores reveal that perturbing MSA embeddings can artificially inflate model confidence. This exposes a vulnerability in current design metrics, whose mitigation could offer a pathway to reduce false discovery rates in binder engineering.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dc1e998b-9cf4-4f95-9443-fd73af0dc7d5Builds on10
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image SynthesisPrafulla Dhariwal, Alexander Quinn NicholNeurIPS 2021 · 13,211 citations
- Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative ModelsTero Karras, Miika Aittala, Timo Aila, Samuli LaineNeurIPS 2022 · 3,959 citations
- AlphaFold Meets Flow Matching for Generating Protein EnsemblesBowen Jing, Bonnie Berger, Tommi S. JaakkolaICML 2024 · 229 citations
- Iterated Denoising Energy Matching for Sampling from Boltzmann DensitiesTara Akhound-Sadegh, Jarrid Rector-Brooks, Avishek Joey Bose, Sarthak Mittal et al.ICML 2024 · 109 citations
Related papers
- Inverse problems with experiment-guided AlphaFoldSai Advaith Maddipatla, Nadav Bojan Sellam, Meital Bojan, Sanketh Vedula et al.ICML 2025
- Protein Conformation Generation via Force-Guided SE(3) Diffusion ModelsYan Wang, Lihao Wang, Yuning Shen, Yiqun Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 65 citations
- ProMiSE: Protein Multi-State Evaluation Benchmark in Biological ContextsBonjae Ku, Seeun Kim, Yubeen Kim, Hahnbeom Park et al.ICML 2026
- Aligning Protein Conformation Ensemble Generation with Physical FeedbackJiarui Lu, Xiaoyin Chen, Stephen Zhewen Lu, Aurélie C. Lozano et al.ICML 2025
- Elign: Equivariant Diffusion Model Alignment from Foundational Machine Learned Force FieldsYunyang Li, Lin Huang, Luojia Xia, Wenhe Zhang et al.ICML 2026
