HYBOOD: A Hybrid Generative Model for Out-of-Distribution Detection with Corruption Estimation
Giwoong Lee, Jiseung Ahn, Jeongyeol Choe
Abstract
We propose HYBOOD, a hybrid out-of-distribution model based on normalizing flow followed by a simple linear classification model. In real-world settings, it is known that data corruption has a strong influence on model degradation; for example image quality like noise, blur and image geometry like translation, scaling, rotation. MNIST-C, CIFAR10-C are the general synthesized datasets to measure model robustness and corruption difficulty in terms of covariate and semantic shifts. HYBOOD shows that the separability between indistribution, covariate shift, and semantic shift can be represented by generative distribution distance and log-scale density. We also find out the types of covariate shifts are ordered by corruption difficulty ranking (CDR) for the datasets. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first method to measure data corruption difficulty with generative models using Wasserstein Distance, Mutual Information and Minimal Description Length. In this paper, we pose interesting experimental results that the generative model tested on MNIST-C is most deteriorated by fog, impulse noise and stripe corruption types. This can be interpreted that those types are challenging corruptions to the generative model in uncertainty and complexity. By training in-distribution data only, HYBOOD achieves out-of-distribution detection performance for distinguishable covariate and semantic shifts, and quantifying covariate shift ranking.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dbf7f3c2-1fec-4556-bbdf-5f28a503602eBuilds on9
- Input Complexity and Out-of-distribution Detection with Likelihood-based Generative ModelsJoan Serrà, David Álvarez, Vicenç Gómez, Olga Slizovskaia et al.ICLR 2020 · 307 citations
- Understanding Failures in Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Generative ModelsLily H. Zhang, Mark Goldstein, Rajesh RanganathICML 2021 · 129 citations
- Hierarchical VAEs Know What They Don't KnowJakob Drachmann Havtorn, Jes Frellsen, Søren Hauberg, Lars MaaløeICML 2021 · 87 citations
- Rethinking Reconstruction Autoencoder-Based Out-of-Distribution DetectionYibo ZhouCVPR 2022 · 69 citations
- Feed Two Birds with One Scone: Exploiting Wild Data for Both Out-of-Distribution Generalization and DetectionHaoyue Bai, Gregory Canal, Xuefeng Du, Jeongyeol Kwon et al.ICML 2023 · 67 citations
Related papers
- CNS-Bench: Benchmarking Image Classifier Robustness Under Continuous Nuisance ShiftsOlaf Dünkel, Artur Jesslen, Jiahao Xie, Christian Theobalt et al.ICCV 2025
- Unified Out-Of-Distribution Detection: A Model-Specific PerspectiveReza Averly, Wei-Lun ChaoICCV 2023 · 18 citations
- ImageNet-OOD: Deciphering Modern Out-of-Distribution Detection AlgorithmsWilliam Yang, Byron Zhang, Olga RussakovskyICLR 2024 · 23 citations
- Why Normalizing Flows Fail to Detect Out-of-Distribution DataPolina Kirichenko, Pavel Izmailov, Andrew Gordon WilsonNeurIPS 2020 · 370 citations
- What If the Input is Expanded in OOD Detection?Boxuan Zhang, Jianing Zhu, Zengmao Wang, Tongliang Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 19 citations
