Resolving the Predicament of Android Custom Permissions
Güliz Seray Tuncay, Soteris Demetriou, Karan Ganju, Carl A. Gunter
Abstract
Android leverages a set of system permissions to protect platform resources. At the same time, it allows untrusted third-party applications to declare their own custom permissions to regulate access to app components. However, Android treats custom permissions the same way as system permissions even though they are declared by entities of different trust levels. In this work, we describe two new classes of vulnerabilities that arise from the 'predicament' created by mixing system and custom permissions in Android. These have been acknowledged as serious security flaws by Google and we demonstrate how they can be exploited in practice to gain unauthorized access to platform resources and to compromise popular Android apps. To address the shortcomings of the system, we propose a new modular design called Cusper for the Android permission model. Cusper separates the management of system and custom permissions and introduces a backward-compatible naming convention for custom permissions to prevent custom permission spoofing. We validate the correctness of Cusper by 1) introducing the first formal model of Android runtime permissions, 2) extending it to describe Cusper, and 3) formally showing that key security properties that can be violated in the current permission model are always satisfied in Cusper. To demonstrate Cusper's practicality, we implemented it in the Android platform and showed that it is both effective and efficient.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext db842295-5fc6-4e40-acc0-c0cc82d61ca0Cited by top-tier papers8
- VRASED: A Verified Hardware/Software Co-Design for Remote AttestationIvan De Oliveira Nunes, Karim Eldefrawy, Norrathep Rattanavipanon, Michael Steiner et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 135 citations
- Android Custom Permissions Demystified: From Privilege Escalation to Design ShortcomingsRui Li, Wenrui Diao, Zhou Li, Jianqi Du et al.S&P 2021 · 32 citations
- Trouble Over-The-Air: An Analysis of FOTA Apps in the Android EcosystemEduardo Blázquez, Sergio Pastrana, Álvaro Feal, Julien Gamba et al.S&P 2021 · 21 citations
- Wear's my Data? Understanding the Cross-Device Runtime Permission Model in WearablesDoguhan Yeke, Muhammad Ibrahim, Güliz Seray Tuncay, Habiba Farrukh et al.S&P 2024 · 12 citations
- Ariadne: Navigating through the Labyrinth of Data-Driven Customization Inconsistencies in AndroidParjanya Vyas, Haseeb Ur Rehman Faheem, Yousra Aafer, N. AsokanUSENIX Security 2025
Related papers
- On Demystifying the Android Application Framework: Re-Visiting Android Permission Specification AnalysisMichael Backes, Sven Bugiel, Erik Derr, Patrick D. McDaniel et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 161 citations
- See No Evil: Phishing for Permissions with False TransparencyGüliz Seray Tuncay, Jingyu Qian, Carl A. GunterUSENIX Security 2020
- APER: Evolution-Aware Runtime Permission Misuse Detection for Android AppsSinan Wang, Yibo Wang, Xian Zhan, Ying Wang et al.ICSE 2022 · 19 citations
- Lost in Conversion: Exploit Data Structure Conversion with Attribute Loss to Break Android SystemsRui Li, Wenrui Diao, Shishuai Yang, Xiangyu Liu et al.USENIX Security 2023
- SoK: Lessons Learned from Android Security Research for Appified Software PlatformsYasemin Acar, Michael Backes, Sven Bugiel, Sascha Fahl et al.S&P 2016 · 101 citations
