The Star Geometry of Critic-Based Regularizer Learning
Oscar Leong, Eliza O'Reilly, Yong Sheng Soh
Abstract
Variational regularization is a classical technique to solve statistical inference tasks and inverse problems, with modern data-driven approaches parameterizing regularizers via deep neural networks showcasing impressive empirical performance. Recent works along these lines learn task-dependent regularizers. This is done by integrating information about the measurements and ground-truth data in an unsupervised, critic-based loss function, where the regularizer attributes low values to likely data and high values to unlikely data. However, there is little theory about the structure of regularizers learned via this process and how it relates to the two data distributions. To make progress on this challenge, we initiate a study of optimizing critic-based loss functions to learn regularizers over a particular family of regularizers: gauges (or Minkowski functionals) of star-shaped bodies. This family contains regularizers that are commonly employed in practice and shares properties with regularizers parameterized by deep neural networks. We specifically investigate critic-based losses derived from variational representations of statistical distances between probability measures. By leveraging tools from star geometry and dual Brunn-Minkowski theory, we illustrate how these losses can be interpreted as dual mixed volumes that depend on the data distribution. This allows us to derive exact expressions for the optimal regularizer in certain cases. Finally, we identify which neural network architectures give rise to such star body gauges and when do such regularizers have favorable properties for optimization. More broadly, this work highlights how the tools of star geometry can aid in understanding the geometry of unsupervised regularizer learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on14
- Robust Compressed Sensing MRI with Deep Generative PriorsAjil Jalal, Marius Arvinte, Giannis Daras, Eric Price et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 483 citations
- Solving Linear Inverse Problems Provably via Posterior Sampling with Latent Diffusion ModelsLitu Rout, Negin Raoof, Giannis Daras, Constantine Caramanis et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 193 citations
- Invertible generative models for inverse problems: mitigating representation error and dataset biasMuhammad Asim, Max Daniels, Oscar Leong, Ali Ahmed et al.ICML 2020 · 172 citations
- Score-Based Diffusion Models as Principled Priors for Inverse ImagingBerthy T. Feng, Jamie Smith, Michael Rubinstein, Huiwen Chang et al.ICCV 2023 · 153 citations
- Diffusion Posterior Sampling for General Noisy Inverse ProblemsHyungjin Chung, Jeongsol Kim, Michael Thompson McCann, Marc Louis Klasky et al.ICLR 2023 · 152 citations
Related papers
- Weakly Convex Regularisers for Inverse Problems: Convergence of Critical Points and Primal-Dual OptimisationZakhar Shumaylov, Jeremy Budd, Subhadip Mukherjee, Carola-Bibiane SchönliebICML 2024 · 19 citations
- Consistency Regularization for Variational Auto-EncodersSamarth Sinha, Adji Bousso DiengNeurIPS 2021 · 83 citations
- Total Deep Variation for Linear Inverse ProblemsErich Kobler, Alexander Effland, Karl Kunisch, Thomas PockCVPR 2020
- End-to-end reconstruction meets data-driven regularization for inverse problemsSubhadip Mukherjee, Marcello Carioni, Ozan Öktem, Carola-Bibiane SchönliebNeurIPS 2021 · 54 citations
- Vector Quantization-Based Regularization for AutoencodersHanwei Wu, Markus FlierlAAAI 2020 · 33 citations
