Mind the Gap: Cake Cutting With Separation
Edith Elkind, Erel Segal-Halevi, Warut Suksompong
Abstract
We study the problem of fairly allocating a divisible resource, also known as cake cutting, with an additional requirement that the shares that different agents receive should be sufficiently separated from one another. This captures, for example, constraints arising from social distancing guidelines. While it is sometimes impossible to allocate a proportional share to every agent under the separation requirement, we show that the well-known criterion of maximin share fairness can always be attained. We then provide algorithmic analysis of maximin share fairness in this setting-for instance, the maximin share of an agent cannot be computed exactly by any finite algorithm, but can be approximated with an arbitrarily small error. In addition, we consider the division of a pie (i.e., a circular cake) and show that an ordinal relaxation of maximin share fairness can be achieved. We also prove that an envy-free or equitable allocation that allocates the maximum amount of resource exists under separation. Task Cake Cutting Pie Cutting Decide whether MMS i = r Yes (Cor. 3.9) No (Thm. 4.2) Decide whether MMS i > r Yes (Thm. 3.8) No (Thm. 4.2) Decide whether MMS i ≥ r Yes (Thm. 3.5) No (Thm. 4.5) Compute the maximin share of an agent No (Thm. 3.2) No (Cor. 4.9) Approximate the maximin share up to ε Yes (Cor. 3.6) Yes (Thm. 4.10) Compute a maximin partition of an agent No (Cor. 3.4) No (Cor. 4.9) Approximate a maximin partition up to ε Yes (Cor. 3.6) Yes (Thm. 4.10
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext da1c5eb6-3761-4246-8a44-6a6993258a24Cited by top-tier papers4
- The Price of Connectivity in Fair DivisionXiaohui Bei, Ayumi Igarashi, Xinhang Lu, Warut SuksompongAAAI 2021 · 52 citations
- The (Exact) Price of Cardinality for Indivisible Goods: A Parametric PerspectiveAlexander Lam, Bo Li, Ankang SunAAAI 2025 · 2 citations
- Reducing Leximin Fairness to Utilitarian OptimizationEden Hartman, Yonatan Aumann, Avinatan Hassidim, Erel Segal-HaleviAAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- Dueling over Dessert, Mastering the Art of Repeated Cake CuttingSimina Brânzei, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Reed C. Phillips, Suho Shin et al.NeurIPS 2024
Builds on4
- The Price of Connectivity in Fair DivisionXiaohui Bei, Ayumi Igarashi, Xinhang Lu, Warut SuksompongAAAI 2021 · 52 citations
- Contiguous Cake Cutting: Hardness Results and Approximation AlgorithmsPaul W. Goldberg, Alexandros Hollender, Warut SuksompongAAAI 2020 · 34 citations
- Weighted Fairness Notions for Indivisible Items RevisitedMithun Chakraborty, Erel Segal-Halevi, Warut SuksompongAAAI 2022 · 33 citations
- The Query Complexity of Cake CuttingSimina Brânzei, Noam NisanNeurIPS 2022 · 25 citations
Related papers
- Maximin Fairness with Mixed Divisible and Indivisible GoodsXiaohui Bei, Shengxin Liu, Xinhang Lu, Hongao WangAAAI 2021 · 21 citations
- Achieving Maximin Share and EFX/EF1 Guarantees SimultaneouslyHannaneh Akrami, Nidhi RathiAAAI 2025 · 9 citations
- Dividing a Graphical CakeXiaohui Bei, Warut SuksompongAAAI 2021 · 20 citations
- Fair Division via the Cake-Cutting ShareYannan Bai, Kamesh Munagala, Yiheng Shen, Ian ZhangAAAI 2025
- Breaking the 3/4 Barrier for Approximate Maximin ShareHannaneh Akrami, Jugal GargSODA 2024 · 26 citations
