Why Less is More (Sometimes): A Theory of Data Curation
Elvis Dohmatob, Mohammad Pezeshki, Reyhane Askari Hemmat
Abstract
This paper introduces a theoretical framework to resolve a central paradox in modern machine learning: When is it better to use less data? This question has become critical as classical scaling laws suggesting more is more'' (Sun et al., 2025) are challenged by methods like LIMO (less is more'') and s1 (Ye et al., 2025; Muenighoff et al., 2025), which achieve superior performance with small, aggressively curated datasets. Here, we study data curation strategies where an imperfect oracle selects the training examples according to their difficulty and correctness. Our results provide exact scaling law curves for test error under both label-agnostic and label-aware curation rules, revealing when and why keeping only a subset of data can improve generalization. In contrast to classical scaling laws, we show that under certain conditions, small curated datasets can outperform full datasets, and we provide analytical conditions for this by deriving precise phase transition curves tied to data size and quality. We validate these theoretical claims with empirical results on ImageNet, confirming our predictions about when curation improves accuracy and can even mitigate model collapse. Furthermore, our framework provides a principled explanation for the contradictory curation strategies recently observed in LLM mathematical reasoning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext da179310-8068-42e1-af07-3bdd16126e7cCited by top-tier papers4
- TarGATE: Target-Aware Data Selection via Token-Attenuation GatesXiandi Luo, Shiwei Li, Haozhao Wang, Yihao Ouyang et al.ICML 2026
- Asymptotic Theory of Iterated Empirical Risk Minimization, with Applications to Active LearningHugo Cui, Yue LuICML 2026
- When Sample Selection Bias Precipitates Model CollapseXinbao Qiao, Xianglong Du, Wei Liu, Jingqi Zhang et al.ICML 2026
- Difficulty-Diversity Collaborative Filtering for Data-Efficient LLM Fine-TuningLong P. Hoang, Wenxuan Zhang, Wei LuICLR 2026
Builds on18
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningBen Sorscher, Robert Geirhos, Shashank Shekhar, Surya Ganguli et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 720 citations
- Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADSina Alemohammad, Josue Casco-Rodriguez, Lorenzo Luzi, Ahmed Imtiaz Humayun et al.ICLR 2024 · 279 citations
- Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?Vishakh Padmakumar, He HeICLR 2024 · 173 citations
- RL on Incorrect Synthetic Data Scales the Efficiency of LLM Math Reasoning by Eight-FoldAmrith Setlur, Saurabh Garg, Xinyang Geng, Naman Garg et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 143 citations
Related papers
- Escaping Collapse: The Strength of Weak Data for Large Language Model TrainingKareem Amin, Sara Babakniya, Alex Bie, Weiwei Kong et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- Improving Data Efficiency via Curating LLM-Driven Rating SystemsJinlong Pang, Jiaheng Wei, Ankit Shah, Zhaowei Zhu et al.ICLR 2025
- Rethinking Data Curation in LLM Training: Online Reweighting Offers Better Generalization than Offline MethodsWanru Zhao, Yihong Chen, Yuzhi Tang, Wentao Ma et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- What Do Learning Dynamics Reveal About Generalization in LLM Mathematical Reasoning?Katie Kang, Amrith Setlur, Dibya Ghosh, Jacob Steinhardt et al.ICML 2025
- Small Data, Big Decisions: Model Selection in the Small-Data RegimeJörg Bornschein, Francesco Visin, Simon OsinderoICML 2020 · 48 citations
