Queue Up Your Regrets: Achieving the Dynamic Capacity Region of Multiplayer Bandits
Ilai Bistritz, Nicholas Bambos
Abstract
Consider N cooperative agents such that for T turns, each agent n takes an action a n and receives a stochastic reward r n ( a 1 , . . . , a N ) . Agents cannot observe the actions of other agents and do not know even their own reward function. The agents can communicate with their neighbors on a connected graph G with diameter d ( G ) . We want each agent n to achieve an expected average reward of at least λ n over time, for a given quality of service (QoS) vector λ . A QoS vector λ is not necessarily achievable. By giving up on immediate reward, knowing that the other agents will compensate later, agents can improve their achievable capacity region. Our main observation is that the gap between λ n t and the accumulated reward of agent n , which we call the QoS regret, behaves like a queue. Inspired by this observation, we propose a distributed algorithm that aims to learn a max-weight matching of agents to actions. In each epoch, the algorithm employs a consensus phase where the agents agree on a certain weighted sum of rewards by communicating only O ( d ( G )) numbers every turn. Then, the algorithm uses distributed successive elimination on a random subset of action profiles to approximately maximize this weighted sum of rewards. We prove a bound on the accumulated sum of expected QoS regrets of all agents, that holds if λ is a safety margin ε T away from the boundary of the capacity region, where ε T → 0 as T → ∞ . This bound implies that, for large T , our algorithm can achieve any λ in the interior of the dynamic capacity region, while all agents are guaranteed an empirical average expected QoS regret of ˜ O (1) over t = 1 , . . . , T which never exceeds ˜ O (cid:0) √ t (cid:1) for any t . We then extend our result to time-varying i.i.d. communication graphs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d9ec8015-23bb-4339-a91a-63f943aeae5cCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Stochastic Multi-Armed Bandits with Unrestricted Delay DistributionsTal Lancewicki, Shahar Segal, Tomer Koren, Yishay MansourICML 2021 · 45 citations
- Cooperative Multi-player Bandit OptimizationIlai Bistritz, Nicholas BambosNeurIPS 2020 · 31 citations
- Decentralized Learning in Online Queuing SystemsFlore Sentenac, Etienne Boursier, Vianney PerchetNeurIPS 2021 · 22 citations
- On Regret with Multiple Best ArmsYinglun Zhu, Robert NowakNeurIPS 2020 · 21 citations
Related papers
- Individual Regret in Cooperative Stochastic Multi-Armed BanditsIdan Barnea, Tal Lancewicki, Yishay MansourNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Distributed Multi-Agent Bandits Over Erdős-Rényi Random NetworksJingyuan Liu, Hao Qiu, Lin F. Yang, Mengfan XuNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Online Submodular Resource Allocation with Applications to Rebalancing Shared Mobility SystemsPier Giuseppe Sessa, Ilija Bogunovic, Andreas Krause, Maryam KamgarpourICML 2021 · 3 citations
- Decentralized Multi-Agent Linear Bandits with Safety ConstraintsSanae Amani, Christos ThrampoulidisAAAI 2021 · 11 citations
- Decentralized Randomly Distributed Multi-agent Multi-armed Bandit with Heterogeneous RewardsMengfan Xu, Diego KlabjanNeurIPS 2023 · 19 citations
