Analyzing and Optimizing Perturbation of DP-SGD Geometrically
Jiawei Duan, Haibo Hu, Qingqing Ye, Xinyue Sun
Abstract
Differential privacy (DP) has become a prevalent privacy model in a wide range of machine learning tasks, especially after the debut of DP-SGD. However, DP-SGD, which directly perturbs gradients in the training iterations, fails to mitigate the negative impacts of noise on gradient direction. As a result, DP-SGD is often inefficient. Although various solutions (e.g., clipping to reduce the sensitivity of gradients and amplifying privacy bounds to save privacy budgets) are proposed to trade privacy for model efficiency, the root cause of its inefficiency is yet unveiled. In this work, we first generalize DP-SGD and theoretically derive the impact of DP noise on the training process. Our analysis reveals that, in terms of a perturbed gradient, only the noise on direction has eminent impact on the model efficiency while that on magnitude can be mitigated by optimization techniques, i.e., fine-tuning gradient clipping and learning rate. Besides, we confirm that traditional DP introduces biased noise on the direction when adding unbiased noise to the gradient itself. Overall, the perturbation of DP-SGD is actually sub-optimal from a geometric perspective. Motivated by this, we design a geometric perturbation strategy GeoDP within the DP framework, which perturbs the direction and the magnitude of a gradient, respectively. By directly reducing the noise on the direction, GeoDP mitigates the negative impact of DP noise on model efficiency with the same DP guarantee. Extensive experiments on two public datasets (i.e., MNIST and CIFAR-10), one synthetic dataset and three prevalent models (i.e., Logistic Regression, CNN and ResNet) confirm the effectiveness and generality of our strategy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d9a91016-0486-4234-96dd-9c64497958e5Builds on27
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated LearningMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrS&P 2019 · 1,778 citations
- Numerical Composition of Differential PrivacySivakanth Gopi, Yin Tat Lee, Lukas WutschitzNeurIPS 2021 · 259 citations
- Understanding Gradient Clipping in Private SGD: A Geometric PerspectiveXiangyi Chen, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Mingyi HongNeurIPS 2020 · 254 citations
Related papers
- GeoClip: Geometry-Aware Clipping for Differentially Private SGDAtefeh Gilani, Naima Tasnim, Lalitha Sankar, Oliver KosutNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- Differentially Private Sharpness-Aware TrainingJinseong Park, Hoki Kim, Yujin Choi, Jaewook LeeICML 2023 · 15 citations
- Eliminating Solution Bias in Differentially Private OptimizationDONGRUN LI, YUN ZENG, Zibo Wei, Jiacheng Wei et al.ICML 2026
- Differentially Private SGD Without Clipping Bias: An Error-Feedback ApproachXinwei Zhang, Zhiqi Bu, Steven Wu, Mingyi HongICLR 2024 · 15 citations
- DOPPLER: Differentially Private Optimizers with Low-pass Filter for Privacy Noise ReductionXinwei Zhang, Zhiqi Bu, Mingyi Hong, Meisam RazaviyaynNeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations
