DASH: A Meta-Attack Framework for Synthesizing Effective and Stealthy Adversarial Examples
Abdullah Al Nomaan Nafi, Habibur Rahaman, Zafaryab Haider, Tanzim Mahfuz, Fnu Suya, Swarup Bhunia, Prabuddha Chakraborty
Abstract
Numerous techniques have been proposed for generating adversarial examples under strict ℓ p -norm constraints. However, such norm-bounded examples often fail to align well with human perception, and only a few methods specifically explore perceptually aligned adversarial examples. Moreover, it remains unclear whether insights from ℓ pconstrained attacks can be effectively leveraged to improve perceptual efficacy. In this paper, we introduce DASH, a differentiable meta-attack framework that generates effective and perceptually aligned adversarial examples by strategically composing existing ℓ p -based attack methods. DASH operates in a multi-stage fashion: at each stage, it aggregates candidate adversarial examples from multiple base attacks using learned, adaptive weights and propagates the result to the next stage. A meta-loss function guides this process by jointly minimizing misclassification loss and perceptual distortion, enabling the framework to dynamically modulate the contribution of each base attack throughout the stages. We evaluate DASH on adversarially trained robust models across CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet while considering visual perception metrics (e.g. SSIM, FID, LPIPS) in the perturbation budget (instead of ℓ p -norm). Despite relying solely on ℓ p -constrained based methods, DASH significantly outperforms state-ofthe-art perceptual attacks such as AdvAD, achieving higher attack success rates (e.g., 20.63% improvement) and superior visual quality, as measured by SSIM, LPIPS, and FID (improvements of ≈ 11, 0.015, and 5.7, respectively). DASH generalizes well to unseen defenses and different white-box/black-box scenarios, making it a practical and strong baseline for evaluating robustness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on20
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural NetworksWeilin Xu, David Evans, Yanjun QiNDSS 2018 · 1,633 citations
- Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary AttackFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 597 citations
Related papers
- Perceptual Adversarial Robustness: Defense Against Unseen Threat ModelsCassidy Laidlaw, Sahil Singla, Soheil FeiziICLR 2021 · 217 citations
- Do Perceptually Aligned Gradients Imply Robustness?Roy Ganz, Bahjat Kawar, Michael EladICML 2023 · 18 citations
- Learning Bregman Divergences with Application to RobustnessMohamed-Hicham Leghettas, Markus PüschelNeurIPS 2024
- Frequency-driven Imperceptible Adversarial Attack on Semantic SimilarityCheng Luo, Qinliang Lin, Weicheng Xie, Bizhu Wu et al.CVPR 2022 · 132 citations
- MultiRobustBench: Benchmarking Robustness Against Multiple AttacksSihui Dai, Saeed Mahloujifar, Chong Xiang, Vikash Sehwag et al.ICML 2023 · 11 citations
