Improved Bounds for Fully Dynamic Matching via Ordered Ruzsa-Szemerédi Graphs
Sepehr Assadi, Sanjeev Khanna, Peter Kiss
Abstract
In a very recent breakthrough, Behnezhad and Ghafari [FOCS'24] developed a novel fully dynamic randomized algorithm for maintaining a (1 -ε)-approximation of maximum matching with amortized update time potentially much better than the trivial O(n) update time. The runtime of the BG algorithm is parameterized via the following graph theoretical concept:
• For any n, define ORS(n)-standing for Ordered Ruzsa-Szemerédi Graph-to be the largest number of edge-disjoint matchings M 1 , . . . , M t of size Θ(n) in an n-vertex graph such that for every i ∈ [t], M i is an induced matching in the subgraph M i ∪ M i+1 ∪ . . . ∪ M t .
Then, for any fixed ε > 0, the BG algorithm runs in O n 1+O(ε) • ORS(n) amortized update time with high probability, even against an adaptive adversary. ORS(n) is a close variant of a more well-known quantity regarding Ruzsa-Szemerédi graphs (which require every matching to be induced regardless of the ordering). It is currently only known that n o(1) ⩽ ORS(n) ⩽ n 1-o(1) , and closing this gap appears to be a notoriously challenging problem.
If it turns out that ORS(n) = n o(1) , namely, the current lower bounds are close to being optimal, then, this algorithm achieves an update time of n 1/2+o(1) for (1 -ε)-approximation of fully dynamic matching, making progress on a major open question in the area.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d986ca75-a44a-426d-ace4-91f7a6846b37Cited by top-tier papers9
- Fully Dynamic Set Cover: Worst-Case Recourse and Update TimeSayan Bhattacharya, Ruoxu Cen, Debmalya PanigrahiSTOC 2026 · 3 citations
- Fully Dynamic Matching and Ordered Ruzsa-Szemerédi GraphsSoheil Behnezhad, Alma GhafariFOCS 2024 · 1 citation
- Stochastic Matching via In-n-Out Local Computation AlgorithmsAmir Azarmehr, Soheil Behnezhad, Alma Ghafari, Ronitt RubinfeldSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Entropy Regularization and Faster Decremental Matching in General GraphsJiale Chen, Aaron Sidford, Ta-Wei TuSODA 2025 · 1 citation
- Streaming and Communication Complexity of Load-Balancing via Matching ContractorsSepehr Assadi, Aaron Bernstein, Zachary Langley, Lap Chi Lau et al.SODA 2025
Builds on9
- Time-Optimal Sublinear Algorithms for Matching and Vertex CoverSoheil BehnezhadFOCS 2021 · 16 citations
- Dynamic Algorithms for Maximum Matching SizeSoheil BehnezhadSODA 2023 · 14 citations
- On Regularity Lemma and Barriers in Streaming and Dynamic MatchingSepehr Assadi, Soheil Behnezhad, Sanjeev Khanna, Huan LiSTOC 2023 · 13 citations
- Dynamic Matching with Better-than-2 Approximation in Polylogarithmic Update TimeSayan Bhattacharya, Peter Kiss, Thatchaphol Saranurak, David WajcSODA 2023 · 11 citations
- New Trade-Offs for Fully Dynamic Matching via Hierarchical EDCSSoheil Behnezhad, Sanjeev KhannaSODA 2022 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Fully Dynamic Matching: Beating 2-Approximation in Δϵ Update TimeSoheil Behnezhad, Jakub Lacki, Vahab S. MirrokniSODA 2020 · 10 citations
- Deterministic Dynamic Maximal Matching in Sublinear Update TimeAaron Bernstein, Sayan Bhattacharya, Peter Kiss, Thatchaphol SaranurakSTOC 2025 · 2 citations
- History-Independent Maximal Matchings can be Surprisingly Efficient, and Lead to Better Worst-Case GuaranteesRathish Das, William KuszmaulSODA 2026 · 1 citation
- A Faster Deterministic Algorithm for Fully Dynamic Maximal MatchingJulia Chuzhoy, Sanjeev Khanna, Junkai SongSTOC 2026
- Dynamic (1+ϵ)-Approximate Matching Size in Truly Sublinear Update TimeSayan Bhattacharya, Peter Kiss, Thatchaphol SaranurakFOCS 2023 · 9 citations
