QuMAB: Query-based Multi-annotator Behavior Pattern Learning
Liyun Zhang, Zheng Lian, Hong Liu, Takanori Takebe, Shozo Nishii, Yuta Nakashima
Abstract
Multi-annotator learning traditionally aggregates diverse annotations to approximate a single “ground truth”, treating disagreements as noise. However, this paradigm faces fundamental challenges: subjective tasks often lack absolute ground truth, and sparse annotation coverage makes aggregation statistically unreliable. We introduce a paradigm shift from sample-wise aggregation to annotator-wise behavior modeling. By treating annotator disagreements as valuable information rather than noise, modeling annotator-specific behavior patterns can reconstruct unlabeled data to reduce annotation cost, enhance aggregation reliability, and explain annotator decision behavior. To this end, we propose QuMAB (Query-based Multi-Annotator Behavior Pattern Learning), which uses lightweight queries to model individual annotators while capturing inter-annotator correlations as implicit regularization, preventing overfitting to sparse individual data while maintaining individualization and improving generalization, with a visualization of annotator focus regions offering an explainable analysis of behavior understanding. We contribute two large-scale datasets with dense per-annotator labels: STREET (4,300 labels/annotator) and AMER (average 3,118 labels/annotator), the first multimodal multi-annotator dataset. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of our QuMAB in modeling individual annotators’ behavior patterns, their utility for consensus prediction, and applicability under sparse annotations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d91922cc-7529-4549-91ba-43344fa8bf2dBuilds on6
- BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language ModelsJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2023 · 7,873 citations
- InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction TuningWenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,013 citations
- Human Uncertainty Makes Classification More RobustJoshua C. Peterson, Ruairidh M. Battleday, Thomas L. Griffiths, Olga RussakovskyICCV 2019 · 362 citations
- Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning ModelsMitchell L. Gordon, Michelle S. Lam, Joon Sung Park, Kayur Patel et al.CHI 2022 · 134 citations
- SimLabel: Similarity-Weighted Semi-supervision for Multi-annotator Learning with Missing LabelsLiyun Zhang, Zheng Lian, Hong Liu, Takanori Takebe et al.AAAI 2026 · 4 citations
Related papers
- Noise Correction on Subjective DatasetsUthman Jinadu, Yi DingACL 2024 · 2 citations
- Aggregating Complex Annotations via Merging and MatchingAlexander Braylan, Matthew LeaseKDD 2021 · 8 citations
- Collaborative Refining for Learning from Inaccurate LabelsBin Han, Yi-Xuan Sun, Ya-Lin Zhang, Libang Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- Learning Calibrated Medical Image Segmentation via Multi-Rater Agreement ModelingWei Ji, Shuang Yu, Junde Wu, Kai Ma et al.CVPR 2021
- NUTMEG: Separating Signal From Noise in Annotator DisagreementJonathan Ivey, Susan Gauch, David JurgensEMNLP 2025
