What Makes Quantization for Large Language Model Hard? An Empirical Study from the Lens of Perturbation
Zhuocheng Gong, Jiahao Liu, Jingang Wang, Xunliang Cai, Dongyan Zhao, Rui Yan
Abstract
Quantization has emerged as a promising technique for improving the memory and computational efficiency of large language models (LLMs). Though the trade-off between performance and efficiency is well-known, there is still much to be learned about the relationship between quantization and LLM performance. To shed light on this relationship, we propose a new perspective on quantization, viewing it as perturbations added to the weights and activations of LLMs. We call this approach ``the lens of perturbation". Using this lens, we conduct experiments with various artificial perturbations to explore their impact on LLM performance. Our findings reveal several connections between the properties of perturbations and LLM performance, providing insights into the failure cases of uniform quantization and suggesting potential solutions to improve the robustness of LLM quantization. To demonstrate the significance of our findings, we implement a simple non-uniform quantization approach based on our insights. Our experiments show that this approach achieves minimal performance degradation on both 4-bit weight quantization and 8-bit quantization for weights and activations. These results validate the correctness of our approach and highlight its potential to improve the efficiency of LLMs without sacrificing performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d8ec5928-3f44-430b-9a6a-42cb2abe9b85Cited by top-tier papers3
- Bridging the Gap Between Promise and Performance for Microscaling FP4 QuantizationVage Egiazarian, Roberto L. Castro, Denis Kuznedelev, Andrei Panferov et al.ICLR 2026 · 38 citations
- Quant Experts: Token-aware Adaptive Error Reconstruction with Mixture of Experts for Large Vision-Language Models QuantizationChenwei Jia, Baoting Li, Xuchong Zhang, Mingzhuo Wei et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- No outlier channels but with outlier blocksShanwen Mao, Hao Zhang, Jiasheng Li, Haoyu Qiao et al.ICLR 2026
Builds on7
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMsTim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, Luke ZettlemoyerNeurIPS 2023 · 5,863 citations
- SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language ModelsGuangxuan Xiao, Ji Lin, Mickaël Seznec, Hao Wu et al.ICML 2023 · 1,493 citations
- Q-BERT: Hessian Based Ultra Low Precision Quantization of BERTSheng Shen, Zhen Dong, Jiayu Ye, Linjian Ma et al.AAAI 2020 · 656 citations
- The case for 4-bit precision: k-bit Inference Scaling LawsTim Dettmers, Luke ZettlemoyerICML 2023 · 315 citations
Related papers
- DuQuant: Distributing Outliers via Dual Transformation Makes Stronger Quantized LLMsHaokun Lin, Haobo Xu, Yichen Wu, Jingzhi Cui et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 206 citations
- Why Do Some Inputs Break Low-Bit LLM Quantization?Ting-Yun Chang, Muru Zhang, Jesse Thomason, Robin JiaEMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- GuidedQuant: Large Language Model Quantization via Exploiting End Loss GuidanceJinuk Kim, Marwa El Halabi, Wonpyo Park, Clemens J. S. Schaefer et al.ICML 2025
- ASER: Activation Smoothing and Error Reconstruction for Large Language Model QuantizationWeibo Zhao, Yubin Shi, Xinyu Lyu, Wanchen Sui et al.AAAI 2025 · 7 citations
- KVQuant: Towards 10 Million Context Length LLM Inference with KV Cache QuantizationColeman Hooper, Sehoon Kim, Hiva Mohammadzadeh, Michael W. Mahoney et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 738 citations
