SAGA: A Security Architecture for Governing AI Agentic Systems
Georgios Syros, Anshuman Suri, Jacob Ginesin, Cristina Nita-Rotaru, Alina Oprea
Abstract
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents increasingly interact, collaborate, and delegate tasks to one another autonomously with minimal human interaction. Industry guidelines for agentic system governance emphasize the need for users to maintain comprehensive control over their agents, mitigating potential damage from malicious agents. Several proposed agentic system designs address agent identity, authorization, and delegation, but remain purely theoretical, without concrete implementation and evaluation. Most importantly, they do not provide user-controlled agent management. To address this gap, we propose SAGA, a scalable Security Architecture for Governing Agentic systems, that offers user oversight over their agents' lifecycle. In our design, users register their agents with a central entity, the Provider, that maintains agent contact information, user-defined access control policies, and helps agents enforce these policies on inter-agent communication. We introduce a cryptographic mechanism for deriving access control tokens, that offers fine-grained control over an agent's interaction with other agents, providing formal security guarantees. We evaluate SAGA on several agentic tasks, using agents in different geolocations, and multiple on-device and cloud LLMs, demonstrating minimal performance overhead with no impact on underlying task utility in a wide range of conditions. Our architecture enables secure and trustworthy deployment of autonomous agents, accelerating the responsible adoption of this technology in sensitive environments. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d894de08-d2ac-4490-99d8-21054a3b97c6Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Agent Smith: A Single Image Can Jailbreak One Million Multimodal LLM Agents Exponentially FastXiangming Gu, Xiaosen Zheng, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du et al.ICML 2024 · 128 citations
- Agents Under Siege: Breaking Pragmatic Multi-Agent LLM Systems with Optimized Prompt AttacksRana Muhammad Shahroz, Zhen Tan, Sukwon Yun, Charles Fleming et al.ACL 2025 · 18 citations
- Device-Oriented Group Messaging: A Formal Cryptographic Analysis of Matrix' CoreMartin R. Albrecht, Benjamin Dowling, Daniel JonesS&P 2024 · 10 citations
- ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du et al.ICLR 2023
Related papers
- AgentNet: Decentralized Evolutionary Coordination for LLM-based Multi-Agent SystemsYingxuan Yang, Huacan Chai, Shuai Shao, Yuanyi Song et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 104 citations
- Internet of Agents: Weaving a Web of Heterogeneous Agents for Collaborative IntelligenceWeize Chen, Ziming You, Ran Li, Yitong Guan et al.ICLR 2025 · 3 citations
- DRIFT: Dynamic Rule-Based Defense with Injection Isolation for Securing LLM AgentsHao Li, Xiaogeng Liu, Hung-Chun Chiu, Dianqi Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 76 citations
- LLM Agents in Law: Taxonomy, Applications, and ChallengesShuang Liu, Ruijia Zhang, Ruoyun Ma, Yujia Deng et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- AGrail: A Lifelong Agent Guardrail with Effective and Adaptive Safety DetectionWeidi Luo, Shenghong Dai, Xiaogeng Liu, Suman Banerjee et al.ACL 2025 · 41 citations
