Transferring Labels to Solve Annotation Mismatches Across Object Detection Datasets
Yuan-Hong Liao, David Acuna, Rafid Mahmood, James Lucas, Viraj Prabhu, Sanja Fidler
Abstract
In object detection, varying annotation protocols across datasets can result in annotation mismatches, leading to inconsistent class labels and bounding regions. Addressing these mismatches typically involves manually identifying common trends and fixing the corresponding bounding boxes and class labels. To alleviate this laborious process, we introduce the label transfer problem in object detection.
Here, the goal is to transfer bounding boxes from one or more source datasets to match the annotation style of a target dataset. We propose a data-centric approach, Label-Guided Pseudo-Labeling (LGPL), that improves downstream detectors in a manner agnostic to the detector learning algorithms and model architectures. Validating across four object detection scenarios, defined over seven different datasets and three different architectures, we show that transferring labels for a target task via LGPL consistently improves the downstream detection in every setting, on average by 1.88 mAP and 2.65 AP 75 . Most importantly, we find that when training with multiple labeled datasets, carefully addressing annotation mismatches with LGPL alone can improve downstream object detection better than off-the-shelf supervised domain adaptation techniques that align instance features. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d891e3ed-fae0-445b-a520-1829ffa3ffa5Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on16
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Segment AnythingAlexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao et al.ICCV 2023 · 13,211 citations
- Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object DetectionXizhou Zhu, Weijie Su, Lewei Lu, Bin Li et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,353 citations
- Fake it till you make it: face analysis in the wild using synthetic data aloneErroll Wood, Tadas Baltrusaitis, Charlie Hewitt, Sebastian Dziadzio et al.ICCV 2021 · 331 citations
- Cross-Domain Adaptive Teacher for Object DetectionYu-Jhe Li, Xiaoliang Dai, Chih-Yao Ma, Yen-Cheng Liu et al.CVPR 2022 · 215 citations
Related papers
- Category Dictionary Guided Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Object DetectionShuai Li, Jianqiang Huang, Xian-Sheng Hua, Lei ZhangAAAI 2021 · 47 citations
- Unsupervised Domain Adaptive 3D Detection with Multi-Level ConsistencyZhipeng Luo, Zhongang Cai, Changqing Zhou, Gongjie Zhang et al.ICCV 2021 · 92 citations
- mDALU: Multi-Source Domain Adaptation and Label Unification with Partial DatasetsRui Gong, Dengxin Dai, Yuhua Chen, Wen Li et al.ICCV 2021 · 27 citations
- SSAL: Synergizing between Self-Training and Adversarial Learning for Domain Adaptive Object DetectionMuhammad Akhtar Munir, Muhammad Haris Khan, M. Saquib Sarfraz, Mohsen AliNeurIPS 2021 · 53 citations
- Decoupled Adaptation for Cross-Domain Object DetectionJunguang Jiang, Baixu Chen, Jianmin Wang, Mingsheng LongICLR 2022 · 88 citations
