Bottleneck-Guided Spectral Subgoals For Offline Goal-Conditioned RL
Hebin Liang, Yi Ma, Chenjun Xiao, Zibin Dong, Zilin Cao, Fei Ni, Yifu Yuan, Jianye Hao
Abstract
Offline goal-conditioned RL (OGCRL) learns to reach arbitrary goals from the offline dataset, but long-horizon performance hinges on crossing a handful of hard-to-cross bottlenecks. These bottlenecks not only dictate the feasible paths toward the goal but also act as critical keypoints, marking the transitions between adjacent regions and providing the agent with essential directional guidance. Prior hierarchical methods pick subgoals by time or short-horizon value heuristics, which do not localize the bottleneck, and therefore the agent loses the clear guidance that bottlenecks could provide about where to pass next. We instead model long-horizon planning as ``cross the next bottleneck'': we apply Laplacian spectral clustering to the offline dataset to expose bottlenecks, identify trajectories from the offline dataset that cross these boundaries, and use the corresponding boundary-supported states as keypoint (KP) candidates. The most representative KPs are then instantiated from these candidates, and a directed KP reachability graph is constructed based on the resulting KPs. We then restrict high-level choices to these bottleneck states and use a pluggable low-level controller to execute the short transitions between them. We provide theory showing that under a standard metastable decomposition of the state space, routing through bottlenecks yields an (approximately) optimal one-step subgoal in terms of hitting-time, and that Laplacian spectra recover bottlenecks with high overlap. Thus, Laplacian spectral clustering can discover near-optimal subgoals under these assumptions. Empirically, the same pattern holds: across D4RL and OGBench, our method achieves state-of-the-art results on a broad set of navigation and manipulation tasks and across diverse dataset regimes, for example, 96.5% on AntMaze and 84.7% on Franka-Kitchen.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d8536cb1-a7f5-4bd0-87f0-48023d5b31d0Builds on19
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- Planning with Diffusion for Flexible Behavior SynthesisMichael Janner, Yilun Du, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Sergey LevineICML 2022 · 1,115 citations
- Contrastive Learning as Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement LearningBenjamin Eysenbach, Tianjun Zhang, Sergey Levine, Ruslan SalakhutdinovNeurIPS 2022 · 331 citations
- RvS: What is Essential for Offline RL via Supervised Learning?Scott Emmons, Benjamin Eysenbach, Ilya Kostrikov, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 225 citations
- Learning to Reach Goals via Iterated Supervised LearningDibya Ghosh, Abhishek Gupta, Ashwin Reddy, Justin Fu et al.ICLR 2021 · 222 citations
Related papers
- PlanDQ: Hierarchical Plan Orchestration via D-Conductor and Q-PerformerChang Chen, Junyeob Baek, Fei Deng, Kenji Kawaguchi et al.ICML 2024 · 4 citations
- Laplacian Representations for Decision-Time PlanningDikshant Shehmar, Matthew Schlegel, Matthew Taylor, Marlos C. MachadoICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Latent Representation Alignment for Offline Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement LearningHyungkyu Kang, Byeongchan Kim, Min-hwan OhICML 2026
- Option-aware Temporally Abstracted Value for Offline Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement LearningHongjoon Ahn, Heewoong Choi, Jisu Han, Taesup MoonNeurIPS 2025 · 22 citations
- Chain-of-Goals Hierarchical Policy for Long-Horizon Offline Goal-Conditioned RLJinwoo Choi, Sang-Hyun Lee, Seung-Woo SeoICML 2026 · 3 citations
