Verifiable Relation Sharing and Multi-verifier Zero-Knowledge in Two Rounds: Trading NIZKs with Honest Majority - (Extended Abstract)
Benny Applebaum, Eliran Kachlon, Arpita Patra
Abstract
We introduce the problem of Verifiable Relation Sharing (VRS) where a client (prover) wishes to share a vector of secret data items among k servers (the verifiers) while proving in zero-knowledge that the shared data satisfies some properties. This combined task of sharing and proving generalizes notions like verifiable secret sharing and zero-knowledge proofs over secret-shared data. We study VRS from a theoretical perspective and focus on its round complexity.
As our main contribution, we show that every efficiently-computable relation can be realized by a VRS with an optimal round complexity of two rounds where the first round is input-independent (offline round). The protocol achieves full UC-security against an active adversary that is allowed to corrupt any t-subset of the parties that may include the client together with some of the verifiers. For a small (logarithmic) number of parties, we achieve an optimal resiliency threshold of t < 0.5(k + 1), and for a large (polynomial) number of parties, we achieve an almostoptimal resiliency threshold of t < 0.5(k+1)(1-) for an arbitrarily small constant > 0. Both protocols can be based on sub-exponentially hard injective one-way functions. If the parties have an access to a collision resistance hash function, we can derive statistical everlasting security, i.e., the protocols are secure against adversaries that are computationally bounded during the protocol execution and become computationally unbounded after the protocol execution.
Previous 2-round solutions achieve smaller resiliency thresholds and weaker security notions regardless of the underlying assumptions. As a special case, our protocols give rise to 2-round offline/online constructions of multi-verifier zero-knowledge proofs (MVZK). Such constructions were previously obtained under the same type of assumptions that are needed for NIZK, i.e., public-key assumptions or random-oracle type assumptions (
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on3
- Function Secret Sharing: Improvements and ExtensionsElette Boyle, Niv Gilboa, Yuval IshaiCCS 2016 · 404 citations
- The Round Complexity of Perfect MPC with Active Security and Optimal ResiliencyBenny Applebaum, Eliran Kachlon, Arpita PatraFOCS 2020 · 19 citations
- Feta: Efficient Threshold Designated-Verifier Zero-Knowledge ProofsCarsten Baum, Robin Jadoul, Emmanuela Orsini, Peter Scholl et al.CCS 2022 · 15 citations
Related papers
- The Round Complexity of Statistical MPC with Optimal ResiliencyBenny Applebaum, Eliran Kachlon, Arpita PatraSTOC 2023 · 5 citations
- HydraProofs: Optimally Computing All Proofs in a Vector Commitment (With Applications to Efficient zkSNARKs Over Data from Multiple Users)Christodoulos Pappas, Dimitrios Papadopoulos, Charalampos PapamanthouS&P 2025
- High-throughput Verifiable Distributed OPRF from Gold PRFNan Cheng, Yohei Watanabe, Yugo Kasashima, Ioannis Katis et al.CCS 2026
- Witness Semantic SecurityPaul Lou, Nathan Manohar, Amit SahaiEUROCRYPT 2024
- Adaptively Secure (Aggregatable) PVSS and Application to Distributed Randomness BeaconsRenas Bacho, Julian LossCCS 2023 · 7 citations
