Learning Geometric Reasoning Networks For Robot Task And Motion Planning
Smail Ait Bouhsain, Rachid Alami, Thierry Siméon
Abstract
Task and Motion Planning (TAMP) is a computationally challenging robotics problem due to the tight coupling of discrete symbolic planning and continuous geometric planning of robot motions. In particular, planning manipulation tasks in complex 3D environments leads to a large number of costly geometric planner queries to verify the feasibility of considered actions and plan their motions. To address this issue, we propose Geometric Reasoning Networks (GRN), a graph neural network (GNN)-based model for action and grasp feasibility prediction, designed to significantly reduce the dependency on the geometric planner. Moreover, we introduce two key interpretability mechanisms: inverse kinematics (IK) feasibility prediction and grasp obstruction (GO) estimation. These modules not only improve feasibility predictions accuracy, but also explain why certain actions or grasps are infeasible, thus allowing a more efficient search for a feasible solution. Through extensive experimental results, we show that our model outperforms state-of-the-art methods, while maintaining generalizability to more complex environments, diverse object shapes, multi-robot settings, and real-world robots.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d78ba37a-83ae-4745-ade7-06b11154167bCited by top-tier papers2
- U-Mind: A Unified Framework for Real-Time Multimodal Interaction with Audiovisual Generationxiang deng, Feng Gao, Yong Zhang, Youxin Pang et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- Learning to Plan Like the Human Brain via Visuospatial Perception and Semantic-Episodic Synergistic Decision-MakingTianyuan Jia, Ziyu Li, Qing Li, Xiuxing Li et al.NeurIPS 2025
Builds on5
- How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?Shaked Brody, Uri Alon, Eran YahavICLR 2022 · 1,717 citations
- Planning with Learned Object Importance in Large Problem Instances using Graph Neural NetworksTom Silver, Rohan Chitnis, Aidan Curtis, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al.AAAI 2021 · 97 citations
- Fourier Transporter: Bi-Equivariant Robotic Manipulation in 3DHaojie Huang, Owen Howell, Dian Wang, Xupeng Zhu et al.ICLR 2024 · 40 citations
- Entity-Centric Reinforcement Learning for Object Manipulation from PixelsDan Haramati, Tal Daniel, Aviv TamarICLR 2024 · 31 citations
- Deep SE(3)-Equivariant Geometric Reasoning for Precise Placement TasksBen Eisner, Yi Yang, Todor Davchev, Mel Vecerík et al.ICLR 2024 · 24 citations
Related papers
- GraphMP: Graph Neural Network-based Motion Planning with Efficient Graph SearchXiao Zang, Miao Yin, Jinqi Xiao, Saman A. Zonouz et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 17 citations
- SLAP: Shortcut Learning for Abstract PlanningY. Isabel Liu, Bowen Li, Benjamin Eysenbach, Tom SilverICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Discovering State and Action Abstractions for Generalized Task and Motion PlanningAidan Curtis, Tom Silver, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Tomás Lozano-Pérez et al.AAAI 2022 · 36 citations
- Reducing Collision Checking for Sampling-Based Motion Planning Using Graph Neural NetworksChenning Yu, Sicun GaoNeurIPS 2021 · 68 citations
- Learning-based Motion Planning in Dynamic Environments Using GNNs and Temporal EncodingRuipeng Zhang, Chenning Yu, Jingkai Chen, Chuchu Fan et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 27 citations
