Tuning Stable Rank Shrinkage: Aiming at the Overlooked Structural Risk in Fine-tuning
Sicong Shen, Yang Zhou, Bingzheng Wei, Eric I-Chao Chang, Yan Xu
Abstract
Existing fine-tuning methods for computer vision tasks primarily focus on re-weighting the knowledge learned from the source domain during pre-training. They aim to retain beneficial knowledge for the target domain while suppressing unfavorable knowledge. During the pre-training and fine-tuning stages, there is a notable disparity in the data scale. Consequently, it is theoretically necessary to employ a model with reduced complexity to mitigate the potential structural risk. However, our empirical investigation in this paper reveals that models fine-tuned using existing methods still manifest a high level of model complexity inherited from the pre-training stage, leading to a suboptimal stability and generalization ability. This phenomenon indicates an issue that has been overlooked in fine-tuning: Structural Risk Minimization. To address this issue caused by data scale disparity during the fine-tuning stage, we propose a simple yet effective approach called Tuning Stable Rank Shrinkage (TSRS). TSRS mitigates the structural risk during the fine-tuning stage by constraining the noise sensitivity of the target model based on stable rank theories. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that incorporating TSRS into fine-tuning methods leads to improved generalization ability on various tasks, regardless of whether the neural networks are based on convolution or transformer architectures. Additionally, empirical analysis reveals that TSRS enhances the robustness, convexity, and smoothness of the loss landscapes in fine-tuned models. Code is available at https://github.com/WitGotFlg/TSRS.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d7446dbb-bf91-42bb-80ab-6d52349ef8b1Cited by top-tier papers2
- Post-pre-training for Modality Alignment in Vision-Language Foundation ModelsShin'ya Yamaguchi, Dewei Feng, Sekitoshi Kanai, Kazuki Adachi et al.CVPR 2025
- Graceful Forgetting in Generative Language ModelsChunyang Jiang, Chi-Min Chan, Yiyang Cai, Yulong Liu et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on11
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Rethinking ImageNet Pre-TrainingKaiming He, Ross B. Girshick, Piotr DollárICCV 2019 · 1,188 citations
- How Do Vision Transformers Work?Namuk Park, Songkuk KimICLR 2022 · 653 citations
- When Vision Transformers Outperform ResNets without Pre-training or Strong Data AugmentationsXiangning Chen, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Boqing GongICLR 2022 · 388 citations
- Co-Tuning for Transfer LearningKaichao You, Zhi Kou, Mingsheng Long, Jianmin WangNeurIPS 2020 · 105 citations
Related papers
- Sensitivity-Aware Efficient Fine-Tuning via Compact Dynamic-Rank AdaptationTianran Chen, Jiarui Chen, Baoquan Zhang, Zhehao Yu et al.CVPR 2025
- Low-Rank Rescaled Vision Transformer Fine-Tuning: A Residual Design ApproachWei Dong, Xing Zhang, Bihui Chen, Dawei Yan et al.CVPR 2024
- Stable-LoRA: Stabilizing Feature Learning of Low-Rank AdaptationYize Wu, Ke Gao, Ling Li, Yanjun WuICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Beyond Low-Rank Tuning: Model Prior-Guided Rank Allocation for Effective Transfer in Low-Data and Large-Gap RegimesChuyan Zhang, Kefan Wang, Yun GuICCV 2025
- Improved Fine-Tuning by Better Leveraging Pre-Training DataZiquan Liu, Yi Xu, Yuanhong Xu, Qi Qian et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 69 citations
