The Effectiveness of Random Forgetting for Robust Generalization
Vijaya Raghavan T. Ramkumar, Bahram Zonooz, Elahe Arani
Abstract
Deep neural networks are susceptible to adversarial attacks, which can compromise their performance and accuracy. Adversarial Training (AT) has emerged as a popular approach for protecting neural networks against such attacks. However, a key challenge of AT is robust overfitting, where the network's robust performance on test data deteriorates with further training, thus hindering generalization. Motivated by the concept of active forgetting in the brain, we introduce a novel learning paradigm called "Forget to Mitigate Overfitting (FOMO)". FOMO alternates between the forgetting phase, which randomly forgets a subset of weights and regulates the model's information through weight reinitialization, and the relearning phase, which emphasizes learning generalizable features. Our experiments on benchmark datasets and adversarial attacks show that FOMO alleviates robust overfitting by significantly reducing the gap between the best and last robust test accuracy while improving the state-of-the-art robustness. Furthermore, FOMO provides a better trade-off between standard and robust accuracy, outperforming baseline adversarial methods. Finally, our framework is robust to AutoAttacks and increases generalization in many real-world scenarios. 1 * Contributed equally. 1 Code is available at https://github.com/NeurAI-Lab/FOMO . 2 Double descent is a phenomenon in deep learning where a model's test error initially increases, decreases, and then increases again as model complexity or dataset size increases (Nakkiran et al., 2021) .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d72eae6f-d0a6-4906-b134-34d485a2d791Builds on11
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data HurtPreetum Nakkiran, Gal Kaplun, Yamini Bansal, Tristan Yang et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,108 citations
- Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningLeslie Rice, Eric Wong, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 935 citations
- Adversarial Weight Perturbation Helps Robust GeneralizationDongxian Wu, Shu-Tao Xia, Yisen WangNeurIPS 2020 · 917 citations
Related papers
- Exploring The Forgetting in Adversarial Training: A Novel Method for Enhancing RobustnessXianglu Wang, Hu DingICLR 2025
- Consistency Regularization for Adversarial RobustnessJihoon Tack, Sihyun Yu, Jongheon Jeong, Minseon Kim et al.AAAI 2022 · 75 citations
- Exploring Memorization in Adversarial TrainingYinpeng Dong, Ke Xu, Xiao Yang, Tianyu Pang et al.ICLR 2022 · 84 citations
- Advancing Example Exploitation Can Alleviate Critical Challenges in Adversarial TrainingYao Ge, Yun Li, Keji Han, Junyi Zhu et al.ICCV 2023 · 6 citations
- On the Over-Memorization During Natural, Robust and Catastrophic OverfittingRunqi Lin, Chaojian Yu, Bo Han, Tongliang LiuICLR 2024 · 21 citations
