Neural optimal feedback control with local learning rules
Johannes Friedrich, Siavash Golkar, Shiva Farashahi, Alexander Genkin, Anirvan M. Sengupta, Dmitri B. Chklovskii
Abstract
A major problem in motor control is understanding how the brain plans and executes proper movements in the face of delayed and noisy stimuli. A prominent framework for addressing such control problems is Optimal Feedback Control (OFC). OFC generates control actions that optimize behaviorally relevant criteria by integrating noisy sensory stimuli and the predictions of an internal model using the Kalman filter or its extensions. However, a satisfactory neural model of Kalman filtering and control is lacking because existing proposals have the following limitations: not considering the delay of sensory feedback, training in alternating phases, and requiring knowledge of the noise covariance matrices, as well as that of systems dynamics. Moreover, the majority of these studies considered Kalman filtering in isolation, and not jointly with control. To address these shortcomings, we introduce a novel online algorithm which combines adaptive Kalman filtering with a model free control approach (i.e., policy gradient algorithm). We implement this algorithm in a biologically plausible neural network with local synaptic plasticity rules. This network performs system identification and Kalman filtering, without the need for multiple phases with distinct update rules or the knowledge of the noise covariances. It can perform state estimation with delayed sensory feedback, with the help of an internal model. It learns the control policy without requiring any knowledge of the dynamics, thus avoiding the need for weight transport. In this way, our implementation of OFC solves the credit assignment problem needed to produce the appropriate sensory-motor control in the presence of stimulus delay.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d72c2ec1-c42f-48e1-8d13-fc4bd7bf2e37Cited by top-tier papers3
- Beyond accuracy: generalization properties of bio-plausible temporal credit assignment rulesYuhan Helena Liu, Arna Ghosh, Blake A. Richards, Eric Shea-Brown et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 10 citations
- Stochastic Optimal Control and Estimation with Multiplicative and Internal NoiseFrancesco Damiani, Akiyuki Anzai, Jan Drugowitsch, Gregory C. DeAngelis et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
- Learning Dynamics of RNNs in Closed-Loop EnvironmentsYoav Ger, Omri BarakNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on2
- Logarithmic Regret Bound in Partially Observable Linear Dynamical SystemsSahin Lale, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Babak Hassibi, Anima AnandkumarNeurIPS 2020 · 106 citations
- A Regret Minimization Approach to Iterative Learning ControlNaman Agarwal, Elad Hazan, Anirudha Majumdar, Karan SinghICML 2021 · 15 citations
Related papers
- Feedback control guides credit assignment in recurrent neural networksKlara Kaleb, Barbara Feulner, Juan Gallego, Claudia ClopathNeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
- Credit Assignment in Neural Networks through Deep Feedback ControlAlexander Meulemans, Matilde Tristany Farinha, Javier García Ordóñez, Pau Vilimelis Aceituno et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 61 citations
- Real-Time Recurrent Reinforcement LearningJulian Lemmel, Radu GrosuAAAI 2025 · 8 citations
- Minimizing Control for Credit Assignment with Strong FeedbackAlexander Meulemans, Matilde Tristany Farinha, Maria R. Cervera, João Sacramento et al.ICML 2022 · 24 citations
- Backprop-Free Reinforcement Learning with Active Neural Generative CodingAlexander G. Ororbia II, Ankur MaliAAAI 2022 · 23 citations
