Around the World in 24 Hours: Probing LLM Knowledge of Time and Place
Carolin Holtermann, Paul Röttger, Anne Lauscher
Abstract
Reasoning over time and space is essential for understanding our world. However, the abilities of language models in this area are largely unexplored as previous work has tested their abilities for logical reasoning in terms of time and space in isolation or only in simple or artificial environments. In this paper, we present the first evaluation of the ability of language models to jointly reason over time and space. To enable our analysis, we create GEOTEMP, a dataset of 320k prompts covering 289 cities in 217 countries and 37 time zones. Using GEOTEMP, we evaluate eight open chat models from three model families for different combinations of temporal and geographic knowledge. We find that most models perform well on reasoning tasks involving only temporal knowledge and that overall performance improves with scale. However, performance remains poor in tasks that require connecting temporal and geographical information. We do not find clear correlations of performance with specific geographic regions. Instead, we find a significant performance increase for location names with low model perplexity, suggesting their repeated occurrence during model training. We further demonstrate that model performance is heavily influenced by prompt formulation -a direct injection of geographical knowledge leads to performance gains, whereas, surprisingly, techniques like chain-of-thought prompting decrease performance on simpler tasks. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d705af1d-0d7b-49e2-8dda-86e7c22921e5Builds on10
- Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on CompositionalityNouha Dziri, Ximing Lu, Melanie Sclar, Xiang Lorraine Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 728 citations
- Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingMelanie Sclar, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov, Alane SuhrICLR 2024 · 682 citations
- Language Models Represent Space and TimeWes Gurnee, Max TegmarkICLR 2024 · 303 citations
- StreamingQA: A Benchmark for Adaptation to New Knowledge over Time in Question Answering ModelsAdam Liska, Tomás Kociský, Elena Gribovskaya, Tayfun Terzi et al.ICML 2022 · 129 citations
- Towards Benchmarking and Improving the Temporal Reasoning Capability of Large Language ModelsQingyu Tan, Hwee Tou Ng, Lidong BingACL 2023 · 24 citations
Related papers
- Do Language Models Have a Common Sense regarding Time? Revisiting Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in the Era of Large Language ModelsRaghav Jain, Daivik Sojitra, Arkadeep Acharya, Sriparna Saha et al.EMNLP 2023 · 17 citations
- TimeSpot: Benchmarking Geo-Temporal Understanding in Vision–Language Models in Real-World SettingsAzmine Toushik Wasi, Shahriyar Zaman Ridoy, Koushik Ahamed Tonmoy, Kinga Tshering et al.ICML 2026
- Living in the Moment: Can Large Language Models Grasp Co-Temporal Reasoning?Zhaochen Su, Juntao Li, Jun Zhang, Tong Zhu et al.ACL 2024
- TIMEDIAL: Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in DialogLianhui Qin, Aditya Gupta, Shyam Upadhyay, Luheng He et al.ACL 2021
- Spatio-Temporal LLM: Reasoning about Environments and ActionsHaozhen Zheng, beitong tian, Mingyuan Wu, Zhenggang Tang et al.ICML 2026 · 4 citations
