IGL-Bench: Establishing the Comprehensive Benchmark for Imbalanced Graph Learning
Jiawen Qin, Haonan Yuan, Qingyun Sun, Lyujin Xu, Jiaqi Yuan, Pengfeng Huang, Zhaonan Wang, Xingcheng Fu, Hao Peng, Jianxin Li, Philip S. Yu
Abstract
Deep graph learning has gained grand popularity over the past years due to its versatility and success in representing graph data across a wide range of domains. However, the pervasive issue of imbalanced graph data distributions, where certain parts exhibit disproportionally abundant data while others remain sparse, undermines the efficacy of conventional graph learning algorithms, leading to biased outcomes. To address this challenge, Imbalanced Graph Learning (IGL) has garnered substantial attention, enabling more balanced data distributions and better task performance. Despite the proliferation of IGL algorithms, the absence of consistent experimental protocols and fair performance comparisons pose a significant barrier to comprehending advancements in this field. To bridge this gap, we introduce IGL-Bench, a foundational comprehensive benchmark for imbalanced graph learning, embarking on 17 diverse graph datasets and 24 distinct IGL algorithms with uniform data processing and splitting strategies. Specifically, IGL-Bench systematically investigates state-of-the-art IGL algorithms in terms of effectiveness, robustness, and efficiency on node-level and graph-level tasks, with the scope of class-imbalance and topology-imbalance. Extensive experiments demonstrate the potential benefits of IGL algorithms on various imbalanced conditions, offering insights and opportunities in the IGL field. Further, we have developed an open-sourced and unified package to facilitate reproducible evaluation and inspire further innovative research, available at: https://github.com/RingBDStack/IGL-Bench.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d6a14a48-bf9d-4c2a-8c67-5e4860a5d74cCited by top-tier papers3
- Dual Prototype-Enhanced Contrastive Framework for Class-Imbalanced Graph Domain AdaptationXin Ma, Yifan Wang, Siyu Yi, Wei Ju et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- SamGoG: A Sampling-Based Graph-of-Graphs Framework for Imbalanced Graph ClassificationShangyou Wang, Zezhong Ding, Xike XieKDD 2026
- One for Two: A Unified Framework for Imbalanced Graph Classification via Dynamic Balanced PrototypeGuanjun Wang, Binwu Wang, Jiaming Ma, Zhengyang Zhou et al.ICLR 2026
Builds on21
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional NetworksHongbin Pei, Bingzhe Wei, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang, Yu Lei et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,445 citations
- Dice Loss for Data-imbalanced NLP TasksXiaoya Li, Xiaofei Sun, Yuxian Meng, Junjun Liang et al.ACL 2020 · 575 citations
- Graph Information BottleneckTailin Wu, Hongyu Ren, Pan Li, Jure LeskovecNeurIPS 2020 · 366 citations
- Graph Structure Learning with Variational Information BottleneckQingyun Sun, Jianxin Li, Hao Peng, Jia Wu et al.AAAI 2022 · 224 citations
Related papers
- OpenFGL: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Federated Graph LearningXunkai Li, Yinlin Zhu, Boyang Pang, Guochen Yan et al.VLDB 2025 · 12 citations
- DHG-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Hypergraph LearningFan Li, Xiaoyang Wang, Wenjie Zhang, Ying Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- ImGCL: Revisiting Graph Contrastive Learning on Imbalanced Node ClassificationLiang Zeng, Lanqing Li, Ziqi Gao, Peilin Zhao et al.AAAI 2023 · 55 citations
- Rethinking Semi-Supervised Imbalanced Node Classification from Bias-Variance DecompositionDivin Yan, Gengchen Wei, Chen Yang, Shengzhong Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 27 citations
- Cluster-guided Contrastive Class-imbalanced Graph ClassificationWei Ju, Zhengyang Mao, Siyu Yi, Yifang Qin et al.AAAI 2025 · 6 citations
