Delaunay Component Analysis for Evaluation of Data Representations
Petra Poklukar, Vladislav Polianskii, Anastasiia Varava, Florian T. Pokorny, Danica Kragic
Abstract
Advanced representation learning techniques require reliable and general evaluation methods. Recently, several algorithms based on the common idea of geometric and topological analysis of a manifold approximated from the learned data representations have been proposed. In this work, we introduce Delaunay Component Analysis (DCA) -an evaluation algorithm which approximates the data manifold using a more suitable neighbourhood graph called Delaunay graph. This provides a reliable manifold estimation even for challenging geometric arrangements of representations such as clusters with varying shape and density as well as outliers, which is where existing methods often fail. Furthermore, we exploit the nature of Delaunay graphs and introduce a framework for assessing the quality of individual novel data representations. We experimentally validate the proposed DCA method on representations obtained from neural networks trained with contrastive objective, supervised and generative models, and demonstrate various use cases of our extended single point evaluation framework. Recently, more general evaluation methods such as Geometry Score (GS) (Khrulkov & Oseledets, 2018) , Improved Precision and Recall (IPR) (Kynkäänniemi et al., 2019) and Geometric Component Analysis (GeomCA) (Poklukar et al., 2021) have been proposed.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d6893b8b-151a-425c-a0ec-ab7e74d7b9d8Cited by top-tier papers3
- Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation LearningWeixin Liang, Yuhui Zhang, Yongchan Kwon, Serena Yeung et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 834 citations
- Geometric Multimodal Contrastive Representation LearningPetra Poklukar, Miguel Vasco, Hang Yin, Francisco S. Melo et al.ICML 2022 · 68 citations
- Evaluating Latent Space Robustness and Uncertainty of EEG-ML Models under Realistic Distribution ShiftsNeeraj Wagh, Jionghao Wei, Samarth Rawal, Brent M. Berry et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 31 citations
Builds on5
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised LearnersTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Kevin Swersky, Mohammad Norouzi et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,611 citations
- Whitening for Self-Supervised Representation LearningAleksandr Ermolov, Aliaksandr Siarohin, Enver Sangineto, Nicu SebeICML 2021 · 378 citations
- Size-Invariant Graph Representations for Graph Classification ExtrapolationsBeatrice Bevilacqua, Yangze Zhou, Bruno RibeiroICML 2021 · 124 citations
- Learning Object-Centric Representations of Multi-Object Scenes from Multiple ViewsNanbo Li, Cian Eastwood, Robert B. FisherNeurIPS 2020 · 64 citations
Related papers
- GeomCA: Geometric Evaluation of Data RepresentationsPetra Poklukar, Anastasiia Varava, Danica KragicICML 2021 · 11 citations
- Topology Distance: A Topology-Based Approach for Evaluating Generative Adversarial NetworksDanijela Horak, Simiao Yu, Gholamreza Salimi KhorshidiAAAI 2021 · 19 citations
- Manifold Topology Divergence: a Framework for Comparing Data ManifoldsSerguei Barannikov, Ilya Trofimov, Grigorii Sotnikov, Ekaterina Trimbach et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 45 citations
- Learning Delaunay Surface Elements for Mesh ReconstructionMarie-Julie Rakotosaona, Paul Guerrero, Noam Aigerman, Niloy J. Mitra et al.CVPR 2021
- : Improving Label-Based Evaluation of Dimensionality ReductionHyeon Jeon, Yun-Hsin Kuo, Michaël Aupetit, Kwan-Liu Ma et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 25 citations
