Understanding and Mitigating Accuracy Disparity in Regression
Jianfeng Chi, Yuan Tian, Geoffrey J. Gordon, Han Zhao
Abstract
With the widespread deployment of large-scale prediction systems in high-stakes domains, e.g., face recognition, criminal justice, etc., disparity in prediction accuracy between different demographic subgroups has called for fundamental understanding on the source of such disparity and algorithmic intervention to mitigate it. In this paper, we study the accuracy disparity problem in regression. To begin with, we first propose an error decomposition theorem, which decomposes the accuracy disparity into the distance between marginal label distributions and the distance between conditional representations, to help explain why such accuracy disparity appears in practice. Motivated by this error decomposition and the general idea of distribution alignment with statistical distances, we then propose an algorithm to reduce this disparity, and analyze its game-theoretic optima of the proposed objective functions. To corroborate our theoretical findings, we also conduct experiments on five benchmark datasets. The experimental results suggest that our proposed algorithms can effectively mitigate accuracy disparity while maintaining the predictive power of the regression models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d5f0de38-cc47-4963-bb8d-bd1f4e4ee99bCited by top-tier papers8
- Selective Regression under Fairness CriteriaAbhin Shah, Yuheng Bu, Joshua K. Lee, Subhro Das et al.ICML 2022 · 39 citations
- Subgroup Robustness Grows On Trees: An Empirical Baseline InvestigationJosh Gardner, Zoran Popovic, Ludwig SchmidtNeurIPS 2022 · 27 citations
- Equal Opportunity of Coverage in Fair RegressionFangxin Wang, Lu Cheng, Ruocheng Guo, Kay Liu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 26 citations
- Understanding the Impact of Adversarial Robustness on Accuracy DisparityYuzheng Hu, Fan Wu, Hongyang Zhang, Han ZhaoICML 2023 · 11 citations
- Differentially Private Post-Processing for Fair RegressionRuicheng Xian, Qiaobo Li, Gautam Kamath, Han ZhaoICML 2024 · 9 citations
Builds on7
- Evaluation of Neural Architectures trained with square Loss vs Cross-Entropy in Classification TasksLike Hui, Mikhail BelkinICLR 2021 · 199 citations
- Fair regression with Wasserstein barycentersEvgenii Chzhen, Christophe Denis, Mohamed Hebiri, Luca Oneto et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 148 citations
- Conditional Learning of Fair RepresentationsHan Zhao, Amanda Coston, Tameem Adel, Geoffrey J. GordonICLR 2020 · 127 citations
- Pairwise Fairness for Ranking and RegressionHarikrishna Narasimhan, Andrew Cotter, Maya R. Gupta, Serena Lutong WangAAAI 2020 · 125 citations
- Fair regression via plug-in estimator and recalibration with statistical guaranteesEvgenii Chzhen, Christophe Denis, Mohamed Hebiri, Luca Oneto et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 52 citations
Related papers
- Meta Optimality for Demographic Parity Constrained Regression via Post-ProcessingKazuto FukuchiICML 2025
- Estimating Structural Disparities for Face ModelsShervin Ardeshir, Cristina Segalin, Nathan KallusCVPR 2022 · 2 citations
- Fair Dataset Distillation via Cross-Group Barycenter AlignmentMohammad Hossein Moslemi, Nima Hosseini Dashtbayaz, Zhimin Mei, Bissan Ghaddar et al.ICML 2026
- Fairness with Adaptive WeightsJunyi Chai, Xiaoqian WangICML 2022 · 47 citations
- Regression under demographic parity constraints via unlabeled post-processingGayane Taturyan, Evgenii Chzhen, Mohamed HebiriNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
