Positive spectrahedra: invariance principles and pseudorandom generators
Srinivasan Arunachalam, Penghui Yao
Abstract
In a recent work, O'Donnell, Servedio and Tan (STOC 2019) gave explicit pseudorandom generators (PRGs) for arbitrary m-facet polytopes in n variables with seed length poly-logarithmic in m, n, concluding a sequence of works in the last decade, that was started by Diakonikolas, Gopalan, Jaiswal, Servedio, Viola (SICOMP 2010) and Meka, Zuckerman (SICOMP 2013) for fooling linear and polynomial threshold functions, respectively. In this work, we consider a natural extension of PRGs for intersections of positive spectrahedra. A positive spectrahedron is a Boolean function f where the A i s are k × k positive semidefinite matrices. We construct explicit PRGs that δ-fool "regular" width-M positive spectrahedra (i.e., when none of the A i s are dominant) over the Boolean space with seed length poly(log k, log n, M, 1/δ). Our main technical contributions are the following: We first prove an invariance principle for positive spectrahedra via the well-known Lindeberg method. As far as we are aware such a generalization of the Lindeberg method was unknown. Second, we prove an upper bound on noise sensitivity and a Littlewood-Offord theorem for positive spectrahedra. Using these results, we give applications for constructing PRGs for positive spectrahedra, learning theory, discrepancy sets for positive spectrahedra (over the Boolean cube) and PRGs for intersections of structured polynomial threshold functions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d5c04515-e327-4dd3-8f87-ec84a2bb4d05Builds on2
Related papers
- Weighted Pseudorandom Generators via Inverse Analysis of Random Walks and ShortcuttingLijie Chen, William M. Hoza, Xin Lyu, Avishay Tal et al.FOCS 2023 · 1 citation
- Testing Positive Semi-Definiteness via Random SubmatricesAinesh Bakshi, Nadiia Chepurko, Rajesh JayaramFOCS 2020 · 8 citations
- Fooling polynomials using invariant theory*Harm Derksen, Emanuele ViolaFOCS 2022 · 2 citations
- Fooling Constant-Depth Threshold Circuits (Extended Abstract)Pooya Hatami, William M. Hoza, Avishay Tal, Roei TellFOCS 2021 · 4 citations
- Strongly refuting all semi-random Boolean CSPsJackson Abascal, Venkatesan Guruswami, Pravesh K. KothariSODA 2021 · 7 citations
