Visual Prompt-Agnostic Evolution
Junze Wang, Lei Fan, Dezheng Zhang, Weipeng Jing, Donglin Di, Yang Song, Sidong Liu, Cong Cong
Abstract
Visual Prompt Tuning (VPT) enables effective adaptation of a frozen Vision Transformer (ViT) to downstream tasks by inserting a small number of learnable prompt tokens into the token sequence at each layer. However, we observe that existing VPT variants often suffer from unstable training dynamics, characterized by gradient oscillations. A closer layer-wise analysis reveals that shallow-layer prompts tend to stagnate early, while deeper-layer prompts exhibit high-variance oscillations, leading to a cross-layer mismatch. These issues contribute to slower convergence and degraded final performance. To address these challenges, we propose the Prompt-Agnostic Evolution () method, which can strengthen vision prompt tuning by explicitly modeling the dynamics of learnable prompts. From a frequency-domain perspective, we initialize prompts in a task-aware direction by uncovering and propagating frequency shortcut patterns that the backbone inherently exploits for recognition. To ensure coherent evolution across layers, we further employ a shared Koopman operator, which imposes a global linear transformation rather than uncoordinated, layer-specific updates. Finally, inspired by Lyapunov stability theory, we introduce a regularizer that constrains error amplification during evolution. Extensive experiments demonstrate that using with VPT variants not only accelerates convergence with an average 1.41 speedup but also yields 1–3% gains on 25 datasets with multi downstream tasks. Beyond performance, remains prompt-agnostic and lightweight, and it integrates seamlessly with diverse VPT variants without backbone modification or inference-time changes, providing a practical and scalable solution for advancing prompt tuning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Gradient Smoothing: Coupling Layer-wise Updates for Improved OptimizationHaoming Meng, Anton Sugolov, Vardan PapyanICML 2026
- Beyond Static Allocation: Dynamic Sensitivity-Aware Fine-Tuning for Vision TransformersYuanyang Cao, Xichun Liu, Fuwei Zhang, Shangqi Deng et al.ICML 2026
Builds on27
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Learning to Prompt for Continual LearningZifeng Wang, Zizhao Zhang, Chen-Yu Lee, Han Zhang et al.CVPR 2022 · 635 citations
- TinyTL: Reduce Memory, Not Parameters for Efficient On-Device LearningHan Cai, Chuang Gan, Ligeng Zhu, Song HanNeurIPS 2020 · 375 citations
Related papers
- Improving Visual Prompt Tuning for Self-supervised Vision TransformersSeungryong Yoo, Eunji Kim, Dahuin Jung, Jungbeom Lee et al.ICML 2023 · 74 citations
- Fair-VPT: Fair Visual Prompt Tuning for Image ClassificationSungho Park, Hyeran ByunCVPR 2024 · 12 citations
- Visual Instance-aware Prompt TuningXi Xiao, Yunbei Zhang, Xingjian Li, Tianyang Wang et al.ACM MM 2025 · 12 citations
- Attention to the Burstiness in Visual Prompt Tuning!Yuzhu Wang, Manni Duan, Shu KongICCV 2025 · 1 citation
- DA-VPT: Semantic-Guided Visual Prompt Tuning for Vision TransformersLi Ren, Chen Chen, Liqiang Wang, Kien A. HuaCVPR 2025
