TRACE: Toulmin-based Reasoning Assessment through Constructive Elements for LLM CoT Evaluation
Yundong Kim, Heyoung Yang
Abstract
Evaluating open-ended outputs from large language models (LLMs) remains challenging due to the absence of ground truth. Existing metrics rely on final-answer accuracy or surface-level statistics, leaving the reasoning process itself unexamined. We introduce TRACE (Toulmin-based Reasoning Assessment through Constructive Elements), a metric that analyzes Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning processes. Rather than judging outcomes, TRACE inspects how arguments are constructed by integrating Toulmin's argumentation theory with Flavell's metacognitive framework to assess reasoning structure. Experiments on 26.3K QA samples across 7 reasoning models show strong correlation with benchmark accuracy (r = 0.74). Furthermore, TRACE is effective as a reinforcement learning reward signal, outperforming accuracy-only baselines. Together, these results indicate that logically sound reasoning leads to higher-quality answers. TRACE thus serves as a complementary metric for evaluating open-ended outputs. Code is available at https: //github.com/hyyangkisti/trace .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d4e5916d-4557-4433-b0f4-ce6dffbe36b1Builds on17
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
- Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human PreferenceWei-Lin Chiang, Lianmin Zheng, Ying Sheng, Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos et al.ICML 2024 · 1,212 citations
- Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and InferenceBenjamin Warner, Antoine Chaffin, Benjamin Clavié, Orion Weller et al.ACL 2025 · 552 citations
Related papers
- Mapping the Minds of LLMs: A Graph-Based Analysis of Reasoning LLMsZhen Xiong, Yujun Cai, Zhecheng Li, Yiwei WangEMNLP 2025
- Efficient Paths and Dense Rewards: Probabilistic Flow Reasoning for Large Language ModelsYan Liu, Feng Zhang, Zhanyu Ma, Jun Xu et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- DAG-Math: Graph-of-Thought Guided Mathematical Reasoning in LLMsYuanhe Zhang, Ilja Kuzborskij, Jason D. Lee, Chenlei Leng et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- ReJump: A Tree-Jump Representation for Analyzing and Improving LLM ReasoningYuchen Zeng, Shuibai Zhang, Wonjun Kang, Shutong Wu et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
- What Makes a Good Reasoning Chain? Uncovering Structural Patterns in Long Chain-of-Thought ReasoningGangwei Jiang, Yahui Liu, Zhaoyi Li, Wei Bi et al.EMNLP 2025
