On Causally Disentangled Representations
Abbavaram Gowtham Reddy, Benin Godfrey L, Vineeth N. Balasubramanian
Abstract
Representation learners that disentangle factors of variation have already proven to be important in addressing various real world concerns such as fairness and interpretability. Initially consisting of unsupervised models with independence assumptions, more recently, weak supervision and correlated features have been explored, but without a causal view of the generative process. In contrast, we work under the regime of a causal generative process where generative factors are either independent or can be potentially confounded by a set of observed or unobserved confounders. We present an analysis of disentangled representations through the notion of disentangled causal process. We motivate the need for new metrics and datasets to study causal disentanglement and propose two evaluation metrics and a dataset. We show that our metrics capture the desiderata of disentangled causal process. Finally, we perform an empirical study on state of the art disentangled representation learners using our metrics and dataset to evaluate them from causal perspective.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d4b07666-2eb2-47b8-92c9-fd44eea729d8Cited by top-tier papers9
- GlanceNets: Interpretable, Leak-proof Concept-based ModelsEmanuele Marconato, Andrea Passerini, Stefano TesoNeurIPS 2022 · 79 citations
- C-Disentanglement: Discovering Causally-Independent Generative Factors under an Inductive Bias of ConfounderXiaoyu Liu, Jiaxin Yuan, Bang An, Yuancheng Xu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 13 citations
- Causal Representation Learning via Counterfactual InterventionXiutian Li, Siqi Sun, Rui FengAAAI 2024 · 13 citations
- Finding Differences Between Transformers and ConvNets Using Counterfactual Simulation TestingNataniel Ruiz, Sarah A. Bargal, Cihang Xie, Kate Saenko et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 10 citations
- When Shift Happens - Confounding Is to BlameAbbavaram Gowtham Reddy, Celia Rubio-Madrigal, Rebekka Burkholz, Krikamol MuandetICLR 2026 · 5 citations
Builds on8
- Weakly Supervised Disentanglement with GuaranteesRui Shu, Yining Chen, Abhishek Kumar, Stefano Ermon et al.ICLR 2020 · 148 citations
- Counterfactual Data Augmentation using Locally Factored DynamicsSilviu Pitis, Elliot Creager, Animesh GargNeurIPS 2020 · 126 citations
- The role of Disentanglement in GeneralisationMilton Llera Montero, Casimir J. H. Ludwig, Rui Ponte Costa, Gaurav Malhotra et al.ICLR 2021 · 97 citations
- Generative causal explanations of black-box classifiersMatthew R. O'Shaughnessy, Gregory Canal, Marissa Connor, Christopher Rozell et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 83 citations
- Weakly Supervised Disentanglement by Pairwise SimilaritiesJunxiang Chen, Kayhan BatmanghelichAAAI 2020 · 59 citations
Related papers
- On Disentangled Representations Learned from Correlated DataFrederik Träuble, Elliot Creager, Niki Kilbertus, Francesco Locatello et al.ICML 2021 · 38 citations
- Benchmarks, Algorithms, and Metrics for Hierarchical DisentanglementAndrew Slavin Ross, Finale Doshi-VelezICML 2021 · 15 citations
- Theory and Evaluation Metrics for Learning Disentangled RepresentationsKien Do, Truyen TranICLR 2020 · 107 citations
- Towards Robust Metrics for Concept Representation EvaluationMateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Pietro Barbiero, Zohreh Shams, Dmitry Kazhdan et al.AAAI 2023 · 32 citations
- Transferring disentangled representations: bridging the gap between synthetic and real imagesJacopo Dapueto, Nicoletta Noceti, Francesca OdoneNeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
