Select to Perfect: Imitating desired behavior from large multi-agent data
Tim Franzmeyer, Edith Elkind, Philip Torr, Jakob Nicolaus Foerster, João F. Henriques
Abstract
AI agents are commonly trained with large datasets of demonstrations of human behavior. However, not all behaviors are equally safe or desirable. Desired characteristics for an AI agent can be expressed by assigning desirability scores, which we assume are not assigned to individual behaviors but to collective trajectories. For example, in a dataset of vehicle interactions, these scores might relate to the number of incidents that occurred. We first assess the effect of each individual agent's behavior on the collective desirability score, e.g., assessing how likely an agent is to cause incidents. This allows us to selectively imitate agents with a positive effect, e.g., only imitating agents that are unlikely to cause incidents. To enable this, we propose the concept of an agent's Exchange Value, which quantifies an individual agent's contribution to the collective desirability score. The Exchange Value is the expected change in desirability score when substituting the agent for a randomly selected agent. We propose additional methods for estimating Exchange Values from real-world datasets, enabling us to learn desired imitation policies that outperform relevant baselines. The project website can be found at https://tinyurl.com/select-to-perfect .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d43aa2f5-f0e2-4e99-9553-126b3c0cd0b0Cited by top-tier papers2
- Learning Strategy Representation for Imitation Learning in Multi-Agent GamesShiqi Lei, Kanghoon Lee, Linjing Li, Jinkyoo ParkAAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Sequential Score DecompositionDan Qiao, Wenhao Li, Shanchao Yang, Hongyuan Zha et al.ICML 2026
Builds on12
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Pretraining Language Models with Human PreferencesTomasz Korbak, Kejian Shi, Angelica Chen, Rasika Vinayak Bhalerao et al.ICML 2023 · 287 citations
- Shapley Q-Value: A Local Reward Approach to Solve Global Reward GamesJianhong Wang, Yuan Zhang, Tae-Kyun Kim, Yunjie GuAAAI 2020 · 159 citations
- Learning to summarize with human feedbackNisan Stiennon, Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Daniel M. Ziegler et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 124 citations
- Behavioral Cloning from Noisy DemonstrationsFumihiro Sasaki, Ryota YamashinaICLR 2021 · 94 citations
Related papers
- SafeMIL: Learning Offline Safe Imitation Policy from Non-Preferred TrajectoriesReturaj Burnwal, Nirav Pravinbhai Bhatt, Balaraman RavindranAAAI 2026
- Multi-Agent Interactions Modeling with Correlated PoliciesMinghuan Liu, Ming Zhou, Weinan Zhang, Yuzheng Zhuang et al.ICLR 2020 · 22 citations
- Learning to Weight Imperfect DemonstrationsYunke Wang, Chang Xu, Bo Du, Honglak LeeICML 2021 · 57 citations
- Limited Preference Aided Imitation Learning from Imperfect DemonstrationsXingchen Cao, Fan-Ming Luo, Junyin Ye, Tian Xu et al.ICML 2024 · 6 citations
- DualCOIL: Offline Imitation Learning from Contrasting DemonstrationsHuy Hoang, Tien Mai, Pradeep Varakantham, Tanvi VermaICML 2026
