Coupling Artificial Neurons in BERT and Biological Neurons in the Human Brain
Xu Liu, Mengyue Zhou, Gaosheng Shi, Yu Du, Lin Zhao, Zihao Wu, David Liu, Tianming Liu, Xintao Hu
Abstract
Linking computational natural language processing (NLP) models and neural responses to language in the human brain on the one hand facilitates the effort towards disentangling the neural representations underpinning language perception, on the other hand provides neurolinguistics evidence to evaluate and improve NLP models. Mappings of an NLP model’s representations of and the brain activities evoked by linguistic input are typically deployed to reveal this symbiosis. However, two critical problems limit its advancement: 1) The model’s representations (artificial neurons, ANs) rely on layer-level embeddings and thus lack fine-granularity; 2) The brain activities (biological neurons, BNs) are limited to neural recordings of isolated cortical unit (i.e., voxel/region) and thus lack integrations and interactions among brain functions. To address those problems, in this study, we 1) define ANs with fine-granularity in transformer-based NLP models (BERT in this study) and measure their temporal activations to input text sequences; 2) define BNs as functional brain networks (FBNs) extracted from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to capture functional interactions in the brain; 3) couple ANs and BNs by maximizing the synchronization of their temporal activations. Our experimental results demonstrate 1) The activations of ANs and BNs are significantly synchronized; 2) the ANs carry meaningful linguistic/semantic information and anchor to their BN signatures; 3) the anchored BNs are interpretable in a neurolinguistic context. Overall, our study introduces a novel, general, and effective framework to link transformer-based NLP models and neural activities in response to language and may provide novel insights for future studies such as brain-inspired evaluation and development of NLP models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- BrainMAP: Learning Multiple Activation Pathways in Brain NetworksSong Wang, Zhenyu Lei, Zhen Tan, Jiaqi Ding et al.AAAI 2025 · 2 citations
- Jacobian-Based Interpretation of Nonlinear Neural Encoding ModelXiaohui Gao, Haoran Yang, Yue Cheng, Mengfei Zuo et al.NeurIPS 2025
- SAEs-BrainMap: Unveiling the Emergence of Specialized Concepts in Deep Models via Brain AlignmentZiming Mao, Jia Xu, Wenxuan Pan, Mufan Xue et al.ICML 2026
Builds on3
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Disentangling syntax and semantics in the brain with deep networksCharlotte Caucheteux, Alexandre Gramfort, Jean-Remi KingICML 2021 · 96 citations
- Low-dimensional Structure in the Space of Language Representations is Reflected in Brain ResponsesRichard J. Antonello, Javier S. Turek, Vy Ai Vo, Alexander HuthNeurIPS 2021 · 60 citations
Related papers
- Neural Language Models are not Born Equal to Fit Brain Data, but Training HelpsAlexandre Pasquiou, Yair Lakretz, John T. Hale, Bertrand Thirion et al.ICML 2022 · 44 citations
- Do Large Language Models Think like the Brain? Sentence-Level Evidences from Layer-Wise Embeddings and fMRIYu Lei, Xingyang Ge, Yi Zhang, Yiming Yang et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- BrainBERT: Self-supervised representation learning for intracranial recordingsChristopher Wang, Vighnesh Subramaniam, Adam Uri Yaari, Gabriel Kreiman et al.ICLR 2023 · 13 citations
- fMRI predictors based on language models of increasing complexity recover brain left lateralizationLaurent Bonnasse-Gahot, Christophe PallierNeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations
- Training language models to summarize narratives improves brain alignmentKhai Loong Aw, Mariya TonevaICLR 2023 · 11 citations
