Destabilizing Iris
Simon Spies, Niklas Mück, Haoyi Zeng, Michael Sammler, Andrea Lattuada, Peter Müller, Derek Dreyer
Abstract
The separation logic framework Iris has been built on the premise that all assertions are stable , meaning they unconditionally enjoy the famous frame rule. This gives Iris—and the numerous program logics that build on it—very modular reasoning principles. But stability also comes at a cost. It excludes a core feature of the Viper verifier family, heap-dependent expression assertions , which lift program expressions to the assertion level in order to reduce redundancy between code and specifications and better facilitate SMT-based automation. In this paper, we bring heap-dependent expression assertions to Iris with Daenerys . To do so, we must first revisit the very core of Iris, extending it with a new form of unstable resources (and adapting the frame rule accordingly). On top, we then build a program logic with heap-dependent expression assertions and lay the foundations for connecting Iris to SMT solvers. We apply Daenerys to several case studies, including some that go beyond what Viper and Iris can do individually and others that benefit from the connection to SMT.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d3e63bbf-5cfd-409e-9bc7-e61054517dd5Cited by top-tier papers3
- Probabilistic Concurrent Reasoning in Outcome Logic: Independence, Conditioning, and InvariantsNoam Zilberstein, Alexandra Silva, Joseph TassarottiPOPL 2026 · 4 citations
- Foundational Multi-Modal Program VerifiersVladimir Gladshtein, George Pîrlea, Qiyuan Zhao, Vitaly Kurin et al.POPL 2026 · 4 citations
- Sound State Encodings in Translational Separation Logic VerifiersHongyi Ling, Thibault Dardinier, Ellen Arlt, Peter MüllerOOPSLA 2026
Builds on12
- Verus: Verifying Rust Programs using Linear Ghost TypesAndrea Lattuada, Travis Hance, Chanhee Cho, Matthias Brun et al.OOPSLA 2023 · 86 citations
- RefinedC: automating the foundational verification of C code with refined ownership typesMichael Sammler, Rodolphe Lepigre, Robbert Krebbers, Kayvan Memarian et al.PLDI 2021 · 83 citations
- Gillian, part i: a multi-language platform for symbolic executionJosé Fragoso Santos, Petar Maksimovic, Sacha-Élie Ayoun, Philippa GardnerPLDI 2020 · 38 citations
- Transfinite Iris: resolving an existential dilemma of step-indexed separation logicSimon Spies, Lennard Gäher, Daniel Gratzer, Joseph Tassarotti et al.PLDI 2021 · 32 citations
- Diaframe: automated verification of fine-grained concurrent programs in IrisIke Mulder, Robbert Krebbers, Herman GeuversPLDI 2022 · 27 citations
Related papers
- An Iris Instance for Verifying CompCert C ProgramsWilliam Mansky, Ke DuPOPL 2024 · 14 citations
- FO-Complete Program Verification for Heap LogicsAdithya Murali, Hrishikesh Balakrishnan, Aaron Councilman, P. MadhusudanOOPSLA 2025
- Abductive Inference of Separation Logic Specifications with Isorecursive User-Defined Predicates and Magic WandsNicolas Klose, Peter MüllerOOPSLA 2026 · 1 citation
- A High-Level Separation Logic for Heap Space under Garbage CollectionAlexandre Moine, Arthur Charguéraud, François PottierPOPL 2023
- Raven: An SMT-Based Concurrency VerifierEkanshdeep Gupta, Nisarg Patel, Thomas WiesCAV 2025 · 1 citation
