Local Differentially Private Release of Infinite Streams With Temporal Relevance
Runze Wang, Jiahao Liu, Miao Hu, Yipeng Zhou, Di Wu
Abstract
The data stream generated by users on web applications is often collected using a local differential privacy (LDP) approach to ensure privacy. This approach offers rigorous theoretical guarantees and low computational overhead, albeit at the expense of data utility. Data utility encompasses both the value of individual data points and the temporal relevance that exists between them, but existing studies primarily focus on enhancing the former utility while neglecting the latter. Furthermore, the collected data often requires cleaning, and we have demonstrated through a case study that data stream lacking time relevance poses a significant risk to users' privacy during the cleaning process. In this paper, for the first time we present an online LDP publishing mechanism while preserving the inherent temporal relevance for the infinite stream, called the Sampling Period Perturbation Algorithm (SPPA). Specifically, we model the temporal relevance between data points as the Fourier interpolation function, resulting in a computational complexity reduction from O (𝑛 2 ) to O (𝑛 log 𝑛) when compared with the conventional Markov approach in the offline setting. To strike a better balance between privacy and utility, we add noise to the sampling period due to its minimal impact on sensitivity, which is analyzed by our novel concepts of (𝜖, 𝜏)-temporal indistinguishability and (𝜖, 𝑤, 𝜏)event LDP. Through extensive experiments, SPPA exhibits superior performance in terms of both data utility and privacy preservation compared to the state-of-the-art baselines. In particular, when 𝜖 = 1, compared with the state-of-the-art baseline, SPPA diminishes the MSE by up to 64.2%, and raises the event monitoring efficiency by up to 21.4%.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- PeGaSus: Data-Adaptive Differentially Private Stream ProcessingYan Chen, Ashwin Machanavajjhala, Michael Hay, Gerome MiklauCCS 2017 · 107 citations
- LDP-IDS: Local Differential Privacy for Infinite Data StreamsXuebin Ren, Liang Shi, Weiren Yu, Shusen Yang et al.SIGMOD 2022 · 88 citations
- Continuous Release of Data Streams under both Centralized and Local Differential PrivacyTianhao Wang, Joann Qiongna Chen, Zhikun Zhang, Dong Su et al.CCS 2021 · 66 citations
- Kalεido: Real-Time Privacy Control for Eye-Tracking SystemsJingjie Li, Amrita Roy Chowdhury, Kassem Fawaz, Younghyun KimUSENIX Security 2021 · 61 citations
- Beyond Value Perturbation: Local Differential Privacy in the Temporal SettingQingqing Ye, Haibo Hu, Ninghui Li, Xiaofeng Meng et al.INFOCOM 2021 · 57 citations
Related papers
- Dual Utilization of Perturbation for Stream Data Publication Under Local Differential PrivacyRong Du, Qingqing Ye, Yaxin Xiao, Liantong Yu et al.ICDE 2025 · 2 citations
- Towards Pattern-aware Privacy-preserving Real-time Data CollectionZhibo Wang, Wenxin Liu, Xiaoyi Pang, Ju Ren et al.INFOCOM 2020 · 46 citations
- MTSP-LDP: A Framework for Multi-Task Streaming Data Publication under Local Differential PrivacyChang Liu, Junzhou ZhaoSIGMOD 2026
- SPAS: Continuous Release of Data Streams under w-Event Differential PrivacyXiaochen Li, Tianyu Li, Yitian Cheng, Chen Gong et al.SIGMOD 2025 · 6 citations
- DPI: Ensuring Strict Differential Privacy for Infinite Data StreamingShuya Feng, Meisam Mohammady, Han Wang, Xiaochen Li et al.S&P 2024 · 17 citations
