How Ready is Your Ready? Assessing the Usability of Incident Response Playbook Frameworks
Rock Stevens, Daniel Votipka, Josiah Dykstra, Fernando Tomlinson, Erin Quartararo, Colin Ahern, Michelle L. Mazurek
Abstract
Incident response playbooks provide step-by-step guidelines to help security operations personnel quickly respond to specific threat scenarios. Although playbooks are common in the security industry, they have not been empirically evaluated for effectiveness. This paper takes a first step toward measuring playbooks and the frameworks used to design them, using two studies conducted in an enterprise environment. In the first study, twelve security professionals created two playbooks each, using two standard playbook design frameworks; the resulting playbooks were evaluated by experts for accuracy. In the second, we observed five personnel using the created playbooks in no-notice threat exercises within a live security-operations center. We find that playbooks can help simplify and support incident response efforts. However, playbooks designed using the frameworks we examined often lack sufficient detail for real-world use, particularly for more junior technicians. We provide recommendations for improving playbooks, playbook frameworks, and organizational processes surrounding playbook use.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers8
- 'We Do Not Have the Capacity to Monitor All Media': A Design Case Study on Cyber Situational Awareness in Computer Emergency Response TeamsMarc-André Kaufhold, Thea Riebe, Markus Bayer, Christian ReuterCHI 2024 · 22 citations
- Incident Response Planning Using a Lightweight Large Language Model with Reduced HallucinationKim Hammar, Tansu Alpcan, Emil C. LupuNDSS 2026 · 16 citations
- True Attacks, Attack Attempts, or Benign Triggers? An Empirical Measurement of Network Alerts in a Security Operations CenterLimin Yang, Zhi Chen, Chenkai Wang, Zhenning Zhang et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 16 citations
- Closing the Chain: How to reduce your risk of being SolarWinds, Log4j, or XZ UtilsSivana Hamer, Jacob Bowen, Md Nazmul Haque, Robert Hines et al.ICSE 2026 · 5 citations
- What We Talk About When We Talk About Frameworks in HCIShitao Fang, Koji Yatani, Kasper HornbækCHI 2026 · 4 citations
Related papers
- Do You Play It by the Books? A Study on Incident Response Playbooks and Influencing FactorsDaniel Schlette, Philip Empl, Marco Caselli, Thomas Schreck et al.S&P 2024 · 13 citations
- An Interview Study on Third-Party Cyber Threat Hunting Processes in the U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityWilliam P. Maxam III, James C. DavisUSENIX Security 2024 · 14 citations
- SoK: A Framework and Guide for Human-Centered Threat Modeling in Security and Privacy ResearchWarda Usman, Daniel ZappalaS&P 2025
- "Threat modeling is very formal, it's very technical, and also very hard to do correctly": Investigating Threat Modeling Practices in Open-Source Software ProjectsHarjot Kaur, Carson Powers, Ronald E. Thompson III, Sascha Fahl et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Alert Alchemy: SOC Workflows and Decisions in the Management of NIDS RulesMathew Vermeer, Natalia Kadenko, Michel van Eeten, Carlos Gañán et al.CCS 2023 · 16 citations
