Breakpoint Transformers for Modeling and Tracking Intermediate Beliefs
Kyle Richardson, Ronen Tamari, Oren Sultan, Dafna Shahaf, Reut Tsarfaty, Ashish Sabharwal
Abstract
Can we teach models designed for language understanding tasks to track and improve their beliefs through intermediate points in text? Besides making their inner workings more transparent, this would also help make models more reliable and consistent. To this end, we propose a representation learning framework called breakpoint modeling that allows for efficient and robust learning of this type. Given any text encoder and data marked with intermediate states (breakpoints) along with corresponding textual queries viewed as true/false propositions (i.e., the candidate intermediate beliefs of a model), our approach trains models in an efficient and end-to-end fashion to build intermediate representations that facilitate direct querying and training of beliefs at arbitrary points in text, alongside solving other end-tasks. We evaluate breakpoint modeling on a diverse set of NLU tasks including relation reasoning on Cluttr and narrative understanding on bAbI. Using novel proposition prediction tasks alongside these end-tasks, we show the benefit of our T5-based breakpoint transformer over strong conventional representation learning approaches in terms of processing efficiency, belief accuracy, and belief consistency, all with minimal to no degradation on the end-task. To show the feasibility of incorporating our belief tracker into more complex reasoning pipelines, we also obtain state-of-the-art performance on the three-tiered reasoning challenge for the recent TRIP benchmark (23-32% absolute improvement on Tasks 2-3).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Say What You Mean! Large Language Models Speak Too Positively about Negative Commonsense KnowledgeJiangjie Chen, Wei Shi, Ziquan Fu, Sijie Cheng et al.ACL 2023 · 23 citations
- Logic-driven Indirect Supervision: An Application to Crisis CounselingMattia Medina Grespan, Meghan Broadbent, Xinyao Zhang, Katherine Axford et al.ACL 2023 · 1 citation
- From Heuristic to Analytic: Cognitively Motivated Strategies for Coherent Physical Commonsense ReasoningZheyuan Zhang, Shane Storks, Fengyuan Hu, Sungryull Sohn et al.EMNLP 2023
Builds on11
- SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence EmbeddingsTianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2021 · 2,496 citations
- ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTOmar Khattab, Matei ZahariaSIGIR 2020 · 1,246 citations
- BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and ComprehensionMike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad et al.ACL 2020 · 1,224 citations
- Probing Natural Language Inference Models through Semantic FragmentsKyle Richardson, Hai Hu, Lawrence S. Moss, Ashish SabharwalAAAI 2020 · 152 citations
- Inducing Causal Structure for Interpretable Neural NetworksAtticus Geiger, Zhengxuan Wu, Hanson Lu, Josh Rozner et al.ICML 2022 · 104 citations
Related papers
- Belief Revision: The Adaptability of Large Language Models ReasoningBryan Wilie, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Etsuko Ishii, Junxian He et al.EMNLP 2024
- Co-occurrence is not Factual Association in Language ModelsXiao Zhang, Miao Li, Ji WuNeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations
- Assessing the Belief Consistency of Large Language Models on the Logical Conversation ProcessTomoki Tsujimura, Matiss Rikters, Masaki Asada, Shusaku Egami et al.ACL 2026
- Selection-Inference: Exploiting Large Language Models for Interpretable Logical ReasoningAntonia Creswell, Murray Shanahan, Irina HigginsICLR 2023 · 110 citations
- Calibrating Reasoning in Language Models with Internal ConsistencyZhihui Xie, Jizhou Guo, Tong Yu, Shuai LiNeurIPS 2024 · 37 citations
