USENIX Security2026Top-tier venue
SoK: The Pitfalls of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Cybersecurity
Shae McFadden, Myles Foley, Elizabeth Bates, Ilias Tsingenopoulos, Sanyam Vyas, Vasilios Mavroudis, Chris Hicks, Fabio Pierazzi
Abstract
Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has achieved remarkable success in domains requiring sequential decision-making, motivating its application to cybersecurity problems. However, transitioning DRL from laboratory simulations to bespoke cyber environments can introduce numerous issues. This is further exacerbated by the often adversarial, non-stationary, and partially-observable nature of most cybersecurity tasks. In this paper, we identify and systematize 11 methodological pitfalls that frequently occur in DRL for cybersecurity (DRL4Sec) literature across the stages of environment modeling, agent training, performance evaluation, and system deployment. By analyzing 66 significant DRL4Sec papers (2018-2025), we quantify the prevalence of each pitfall and find an average of over five pitfalls per paper. We demonstrate the practical impact of these pitfalls using controlled experiments in (i) autonomous cyber defense, (ii) adversarial malware creation, and (iii) web security testing environments. Finally, we provide actionable recommendations for each pitfall to support the development of more rigorous and deployable DRL-based security systems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d3230f76-c90e-4175-9e0f-af9401571fb3Builds on36
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingLili Chen, Kevin Lu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Kimin Lee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,557 citations
- Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical PrecipiceRishabh Agarwal, Max Schwarzer, Pablo Samuel Castro, Aaron C. Courville et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,067 citations
- Model Based Reinforcement Learning for AtariLukasz Kaiser, Mohammad Babaeizadeh, Piotr Milos, Blazej Osinski et al.ICLR 2020 · 969 citations
- Evaluating Fuzz TestingGeorge Klees, Andrew Ruef, Benji Cooper, Shiyi Wei et al.CCS 2018 · 753 citations
- TESSERACT: Eliminating Experimental Bias in Malware Classification across Space and TimeFeargus Pendlebury, Fabio Pierazzi, Roberto Jordaney, Johannes Kinder et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 441 citations
Related papers
- Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer SecurityDaniel Arp, Erwin Quiring, Feargus Pendlebury, Alexander Warnecke et al.USENIX Security 2022
- Chasing Shadows: Pitfalls in LLM Security ResearchJonathan Evertz, Niklas Risse, Nicolai Neuer, Andreas Müller et al.NDSS 2026 · 17 citations
- Malicious Attacks against Deep Reinforcement Learning InterpretationsMengdi Huai, Jianhui Sun, Renqin Cai, Liuyi Yao et al.KDD 2020 · 27 citations
- Beyond Rewards in RL for Cyber DefenceElizabeth Bates, Chris Hicks, Vasilios MavroudisICML 2026 · 3 citations
- APIRL: Deep Reinforcement Learning for REST API FuzzingMyles Foley, Sergio MaffeisAAAI 2025 · 6 citations
