Cease at the Ultimate Goodness: Towards Efficient Website Fingerprinting Defense via Iterative Mutual Information Minimization
Rong Wang, Zhen Ling, Guangchi Liu, Shaofeng Li, Junzhou Luo, Xinwen Fu
Abstract
In response to growing online privacy threats, the Tor network offers essential protection against surveillance by routing traffic through a decentralized, encrypted infrastructure. However, Website Fingerprinting Attacks (WFA) present a formidable challenge to Tor's anonymity. This paper introduces FRUGAL, a traffic obfuscation method that leverages the mutual information (MI) reduction between website traffic and labels as an optimization goal, advancing a novel perspective for Website Fingerprinting Defense (WFD). By strategically injecting dummy packets at positions within website traffic that contribute most to cumulative MI reduction, FRUGAL achieves notable performance compared to state-of-the-art (SOTA) defense mechanisms. It effectively reduces attack success rates (ASR) across diverse attack models while maintaining minimal bandwidth overhead (BWO) and mitigating the impact of adversarial training. Extensive experiments validate the efficacy of FRUGAL across a comprehensive set of scenarios, including closed-world, open-world, and real-world simulation settings. For example, in the closed-world setting, FRUGAL reduces the ASR of the DF model to 2.68% with a 30% BWO, substantially outperforming previous SOTA defenses, such as Palette (11.54% with 87% BWO). When the BWO of FRUGAL is increased to a comparable level of 80%, the ASR further drops below 1%, demonstrating significant resilience by remaining low at 9.42% even after adversarial training, compared to 20.27% for Palette. This work not only introduces a fresh perspective on WFD research but also establishes FRUGAL as a robust and universal defense framework against WFA.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d2b3b9c7-3ce7-44c7-af07-0abc4b3a2030Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on21
- Deep Fingerprinting: Undermining Website Fingerprinting Defenses with Deep LearningPayap Sirinam, Mohsen Imani, Marc Juarez, Matthew WrightCCS 2018 · 632 citations
- Website Fingerprinting at Internet ScaleAndriy Panchenko, Fabian Lanze, Jan Pennekamp, Thomas Engel et al.NDSS 2016 · 625 citations
- CLUB: A Contrastive Log-ratio Upper Bound of Mutual InformationPengyu Cheng, Weituo Hao, Shuyang Dai, Jiachang Liu et al.ICML 2020 · 512 citations
- k-fingerprinting: A Robust Scalable Website Fingerprinting TechniqueJamie Hayes, George DanezisUSENIX Security 2016 · 474 citations
- Automated Website Fingerprinting through Deep LearningVera Rimmer, Davy Preuveneers, Marc Juarez, Tom van Goethem et al.NDSS 2018 · 399 citations
Related papers
- Real-Time Website Fingerprinting Defense via Traffic Cluster AnonymizationMeng Shen, Kexin Ji, Jinhe Wu, Qi Li et al.S&P 2024 · 26 citations
- Zero-delay Lightweight Defenses against Website FingerprintingJiajun Gong, Tao WangUSENIX Security 2020
- SoK: A Critical Evaluation of Efficient Website Fingerprinting DefensesNate Mathews, James K. Holland, Se Eun Oh, Mohammad Saidur Rahman et al.S&P 2023
- Towards an Efficient Defense against Deep Learning based Website FingerprintingZhen Ling, Gui Xiao, Wenjia Wu, Xiaodan Gu et al.INFOCOM 2022 · 17 citations
- Trace-agnostic and Adversarial Training-resilient Website Fingerprinting DefenseLitao Qiao, Bang Wu, Heng Li, Cuiying Gao et al.INFOCOM 2024 · 8 citations
