Pruning vs Quantization: Which is Better?
Andrey Kuzmin, Markus Nagel, Mart van Baalen, Arash Behboodi, Tijmen Blankevoort
Abstract
Neural network pruning and quantization techniques are almost as old as neural networks themselves. However, to date only ad-hoc comparisons between the two have been published. In this paper, we set out to answer the question on which is better: neural network quantization or pruning? By answering this question, we hope to inform design decisions made on neural network hardware going forward. We provide an extensive comparison between the two techniques for compressing deep neural networks. First, we give an analytical comparison of expected quantization and pruning error for general data distributions. Then, we provide lower bounds for the per-layer pruning and quantization error in trained networks, and compare these to empirical error after optimization. Finally, we provide an extensive experimental comparison for training 9 large-scale models on 4 tasks. Our results show that in most cases quantization outperforms pruning. Only in some scenarios with very high compression ratio, pruning might be beneficial from an accuracy standpoint. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d29dcdfc-b26f-4518-b0e6-a15a9260eb99Cited by top-tier papers15
- ESPACE: Dimensionality Reduction of Activations for Model CompressionCharbel Sakr, Brucek KhailanyNeurIPS 2024 · 21 citations
- Learning from Students: Applying t-Distributions to Explore Accurate and Efficient Formats for LLMsJordan Dotzel, Yuzong Chen, Bahaa Kotb, Sushma Prasad et al.ICML 2024 · 20 citations
- ERQ: Error Reduction for Post-Training Quantization of Vision TransformersYunshan Zhong, Jiawei Hu, You Huang, Yuxin Zhang et al.ICML 2024 · 14 citations
- MicroScopiQ: Accelerating Foundational Models through Outlier-Aware Microscaling QuantizationAkshat Ramachandran, Souvik Kundu, Tushar KrishnaISCA 2025 · 10 citations
- Large Language Model Compression with Global Rank and Sparsity OptimizationChanghai Zhou, Qian Qiao, Yuhua Zhou, Yuxin Wu et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
Builds on18
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Searching for MobileNetV3Andrew Howard, Ruoming Pang, Hartwig Adam, Quoc V. Le et al.ICCV 2019 · 9,163 citations
- SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can be Accurately Pruned in One-ShotElias Frantar, Dan AlistarhICML 2023 · 1,240 citations
- Learned Step Size quantizationSteven K. Esser, Jeffrey L. McKinstry, Deepika Bablani, Rathinakumar Appuswamy et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,037 citations
- Up or Down? Adaptive Rounding for Post-Training QuantizationMarkus Nagel, Rana Ali Amjad, Mart van Baalen, Christos Louizos et al.ICML 2020 · 816 citations
Related papers
- Effective Interplay between Sparsity and Quantization: From Theory to PracticeSimla Burcu Harma, Ayan Chakraborty, Elizaveta Kostenok, Danila Mishin et al.ICLR 2025
- Automatic Neural Network Compression by Sparsity-Quantization Joint Learning: A Constrained Optimization-Based ApproachHaichuan Yang, Shupeng Gui, Yuhao Zhu, Ji LiuCVPR 2020
- Optimal Brain Compression: A Framework for Accurate Post-Training Quantization and PruningElias Frantar, Dan AlistarhNeurIPS 2022 · 440 citations
- A Probabilistic Approach to Neural Network PruningXin Qian, Diego KlabjanICML 2021 · 24 citations
- Unified Data-Free Compression: Pruning and Quantization without Fine-TuningShipeng Bai, Jun Chen, Xintian Shen, Yixuan Qian et al.ICCV 2023 · 31 citations
