Lune

NeurIPS2022Top-tier venue

In Differential Privacy, There is Truth: on Vote-Histogram Leakage in Ensemble Private Learning

Jiaqi Wang, Roei Schuster, Ilia Shumailov, David Lie, Nicolas Papernot

2022Year
8Citations
3Top-tier citations

Abstract

When learning from sensitive data, care must be taken to ensure that training algorithms address privacy concerns. The canonical Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles, or PATE, computes output labels by aggregating the predictions of a (possibly distributed) collection of teacher models via a voting mechanism. The mechanism adds noise to attain a differential privacy guarantee with respect to the teachers' training data. In this work, we observe that this use of noise, which makes PATE predictions stochastic, enables new forms of leakage of sensitive information. For a given input, our adversary exploits this stochasticity to extract high-fidelity histograms of the votes submitted by the underlying teachers. From these histograms, the adversary can learn sensitive attributes of the input such as race, gender, or age. Although this attack does not directly violate the differential privacy guarantee, it clearly violates privacy norms and expectations, and would not be possible at all\textit{at all} without the noise inserted to obtain differential privacy. In fact, counter-intuitively, the attack becomes easier as we add more noise\textbf{becomes easier as we add more noise} to provide stronger differential privacy. We hope this encourages future work to consider privacy holistically rather than treat differential privacy as a panacea.

Ask about this paper

Ask your agent about it.

Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Lunesearch_papers

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers3

Ask how each one uses it

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines