Is Attention Better Than Matrix Decomposition?
Zhengyang Geng, Meng-Hao Guo, Hongxu Chen, Xia Li, Ke Wei, Zhouchen Lin
Abstract
As an essential ingredient of modern deep learning, attention mechanism, especially self-attention, plays a vital role in the global correlation discovery. However, is hand-crafted attention irreplaceable when modeling the global context? Our intriguing finding is that self-attention is not better than the matrix decomposition (MD) model developed 20 years ago regarding the performance and computational cost for encoding the long-distance dependencies. We model the global context issue as a low-rank recovery problem and show that its optimization algorithms can help design global information blocks. This paper then proposes a series of Hamburgers, in which we employ the optimization algorithms for solving MDs to factorize the input representations into sub-matrices and reconstruct a low-rank embedding. Hamburgers with different MDs can perform favorably against the popular global context module self-attention when carefully coping with gradients back-propagated through MDs. Comprehensive experiments are conducted in the vision tasks where it is crucial to learn the global context, including semantic segmentation and image generation, demonstrating significant improvements over self-attention and its variants. Code is available.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d1e7d38e-65ef-41d9-9b5f-8802bd1d2356Cited by top-tier papers35
- SegNeXt: Rethinking Convolutional Attention Design for Semantic SegmentationMeng-Hao Guo, Cheng-Ze Lu, Qibin Hou, Zhengning Liu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 1,385 citations
- SOFT: Softmax-free Transformer with Linear ComplexityJiachen Lu, Jinghan Yao, Junge Zhang, Xiatian Zhu et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 232 citations
- JFB: Jacobian-Free Backpropagation for Implicit NetworksSamy Wu Fung, Howard Heaton, Qiuwei Li, Daniel McKenzie et al.AAAI 2022 · 123 citations
- On Training Implicit ModelsZhengyang Geng, Xin-Yu Zhang, Shaojie Bai, Yisen Wang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 111 citations
- Graph Neural Networks Inspired by Classical Iterative AlgorithmsYongyi Yang, Tang Liu, Yangkun Wang, Jinjing Zhou et al.ICML 2021 · 94 citations
Builds on25
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language RepresentationsZhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel et al.ICLR 2020 · 7,418 citations
- ViViT: A Video Vision TransformerAnurag Arnab, Mostafa Dehghani, Georg Heigold, Chen Sun et al.ICCV 2021 · 2,947 citations
- Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear AttentionAngelos Katharopoulos, Apoorv Vyas, Nikolaos Pappas, François FleuretICML 2020 · 2,665 citations
Related papers
- Learning Dictionary for Visual AttentionYingjie Liu, Xuan Liu, Hui Yu, Xuan Tang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5 citations
- Orthogonal Transformer: An Efficient Vision Transformer Backbone with Token OrthogonalizationHuaibo Huang, Xiaoqiang Zhou, Ran HeNeurIPS 2022 · 35 citations
- Rethinking Transformer for Long Contextual Histopathology Whole Slide Image AnalysisHonglin Li, Yunlong Zhang, Pingyi Chen, Zhongyi Shui et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 27 citations
- Linear Context Transform BlockDongsheng Ruan, Jun Wen, Nenggan Zheng, Min ZhengAAAI 2020 · 26 citations
- Attentive Normalization for Conditional Image GenerationYi Wang, Ying-Cong Chen, Xiangyu Zhang, Jian Sun et al.CVPR 2020
