Starburst: A Cost-aware Scheduler for Hybrid Cloud
Michael Luo, Siyuan Zhuang, Suryaprakash Vengadesan, Romil Bhardwaj, Justin Chang, Eric J. Friedman, Scott Shenker, Ion Stoica
Abstract
To efficiently tackle bursts in job demand, organizations employ hybrid cloud architectures to scale their batch workloads from their private clusters to public cloud. This requires transforming cluster schedulers into cloud-enabled versions to navigate the tradeoff between cloud costs and scheduler objectives such as job completion time (JCT). However, our analysis over production-level traces show that existing cloud-enabled schedulers incur inefficient cost-JCT trade-offs due to low cluster utilization.
We present Starburst, a system that maximizes cluster utilization to streamline the cost-JCT tradeoff. Starburst's scheduler dynamically controls jobs' waiting times to improve utilization-it assigns longer waits for large jobs to increase their chances of running on the cluster, and shorter waits to small jobs to increase their chances of running on the cloud. To offer configurability, Starburst provides system administrators a simple waiting budget framework to tune their position on the cost-JCT curve. A departure from traditional cluster schedulers, Starburst operates as a higher-level resource manager over a private cluster and dynamic cloud clusters. Simulations over production-level traces and real-world experiments on a 32-GPU private cluster show that Starburst can reduce cloud costs by up to 54-91% over existing cluster managers, while increasing average JCT by at most 5.8%.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d1e33cd4-e637-4478-9780-cb75fb92a456Builds on11
- FIRM: An Intelligent Fine-grained Resource Management Framework for SLO-Oriented MicroservicesHaoran Qiu, Subho S. Banerjee, Saurabh Jha, Zbigniew T. Kalbarczyk et al.OSDI 2020 · 350 citations
- Autopilot: workload autoscaling at GoogleKrzysztof Rzadca, Pawel Findeisen, Jacek Swiderski, Przemyslaw Zych et al.EuroSys 2020 · 299 citations
- Heterogeneity-Aware Cluster Scheduling Policies for Deep Learning WorkloadsDeepak Narayanan, Keshav Santhanam, Fiodar Kazhamiaka, Amar Phanishayee et al.OSDI 2020 · 286 citations
- Sinan: ML-based and QoS-aware resource management for cloud microservicesYanqi Zhang, Weizhe Hua, Zhuangzhuang Zhou, G. Edward Suh et al.ASPLOS 2021 · 226 citations
- AlpaServe: Statistical Multiplexing with Model Parallelism for Deep Learning ServingZhuohan Li, Lianmin Zheng, Yinmin Zhong, Vincent Liu et al.OSDI 2023 · 211 citations
Related papers
- Waiting game: optimally provisioning fixed resources for cloud-enabled schedulersPradeep Ambati, Noman Bashir, David Irwin, Prashant J. ShenoySC 2020 · 14 citations
- Eva: Cost-Efficient Cloud-Based Cluster SchedulingTzu-Tao Chang, Shivaram VenkataramanEuroSys 2025 · 2 citations
- Qonductor: A Cloud Orchestrator for Quantum ComputingEmmanouil Giortamis, Francisco Romão, Nathaniel Tornow, Dmitry Lugovoy et al.SC 2025 · 4 citations
- Going Green for Less Green: Optimizing the Cost of Reducing Cloud Carbon EmissionsWalid A. Hanafy, Qianlin Liang, Noman Bashir, Abel Souza et al.ASPLOS 2024 · 43 citations
- Pollux: Co-adaptive Cluster Scheduling for Goodput-Optimized Deep LearningAurick Qiao, Sang Keun Choe, Suhas Jayaram Subramanya, Willie Neiswanger et al.OSDI 2021 · 258 citations
