Bias-Restrained Prefix Representation Finetuning for Mathematical Reasoning
Sirui Liang, Pengfei Cao, Jian Zhao, Cong Huang, Jun Zhao, Kang Liu
Abstract
Parameter-Efficient finetuning (PEFT) enhances model performance on downstream tasks by updating a minimal subset of parameters. Representation finetuning (ReFT) methods further improve efficiency by freezing model weights and optimizing internal representations with fewer parameters than PEFT, outperforming PEFT on several tasks. However, ReFT exhibits a significant performance decline on mathematical reasoning tasks. To address this problem, the paper demonstrates that ReFT's poor performance on mathematical tasks primarily stems from its struggle to generate effective reasoning prefixes during the early inference phase. Moreover, ReFT disturbs the numerical encoding and the error accumulats during the CoT stage. Based on these observations, this paper proposes Bias-REstrained Prefix Representation FineTuning (BREP ReFT), which enhances ReFT's mathematical reasoning capability by truncating training data to optimize the generation of initial reasoning prefixes, intervening on the early inference stage to prevent error accumulation, and constraining the intervention vectors' magnitude to avoid disturbing numerical encoding. Extensive experiments across diverse model architectures demonstrate BREP's superior effectiveness, efficiency, and robust generalization capability, outperforming both standard ReFT and weight-based PEFT methods on the task of mathematical reasoning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d157a950-da6f-412d-bf2c-8822948fa677Builds on21
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
- Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language ModelKenneth Li, Oam Patel, Fernanda B. Viégas, Hanspeter Pfister et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,549 citations
Related papers
- ReFT: Representation Finetuning for Language ModelsZhengxuan Wu, Aryaman Arora, Zheng Wang, Atticus Geiger et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 233 citations
- Enhancing Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Critical Representation Fine-tuningChenxi Huang, Shaotian Yan, Liang Xie, Binbin Lin et al.ACL 2025
- PrefixMemory-Tuning: Modernizing Prefix-Tuning by Decoupling the Prefix from AttentionHaonan Wang, Brian K Chen, Siquan Li, Liang Xinhe et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- TARE: Lightweight Token-Aware Representation Editing for Fine-tuning Transformer-like ModelsYulong Wang, Siyu ZhaoACL 2026
- Look Within or Beyond? A Theoretical Comparison Between Parameter-Efficient and Full Fine-TuningYongkang Liu, Xingle Xu, Ercong Nie, Zijing Wang et al.ACL 2026
