Adaptivity Gaps for Stochastic Probing with Subadditive Functions
Jian Li, Yinchen Liu, Yiran Zhang
Abstract
In this paper, we study the stochastic probing problem under a general monotone norm objective. We are given a ground set , where each element i is associated with an independent nonnegative random variable (with a known distribution). We may probe these elements adaptively, and upon probing an element i, its value is realized. The sequence of probed elements must satisfy a prefix-closed feasibility constraint , such as a matroid, an orienteering constraint, or any other downward-closed constraint. We also have a monotone norm function . Let be the set of probed elements. Then the reward is , where is an n-dimensional vector whose i-th coordinate equals the realized value of if (i.e., element i is probed), and 0 otherwise. Our objective is to design a probing strategy that maximizes the expected reward . We study the adaptivity gap of the problem, defined as the ratio between the expected reward of an optimal adaptive strategy and that of an optimal non-adaptive strategy. A small adaptivity gap allows us to focus on designing nonadaptive strategies, which are typically simpler to represent and analyze. Establishing tight adaptivity gaps is a central challenge in stochastic combinatorial optimization and has been studied extensively for stochastic probing problems with various objective functions. In this paper, we resolve a central open problem in this line of research, posed in [1], [2], by proving that the adaptivity gap for stochastic probing with general monotone norms is bounded by . With a refined analysis, we can further strengthen the bound to where r is the maximum length of a sequence in the feasibility constraint (). As a by-product, we obtain an asymptotically tight adaptivity gap for Bernoulli stochastic probing with binary-XOS objectives, matching the lower bound in [1]. We also obtain an upper bound for Bernoulli stochastic probing with general subadditive objectives. Furthermore, for monotone symmetric norms, we prove that the adaptivity gap can be bounded by , answering an open question posed in [3] and improving upon their upper bound. Index Terms-stochastic probing, adaptivity gap, subadditive objective
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d117908a-bfa6-4e7f-a447-c598986747dcCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Approximation Algorithms for Stochastic Minimum-Norm Combinatorial OptimizationSharat Ibrahimpur, Chaitanya SwamyFOCS 2020 · 8 citations
- Parameterized Approximation Schemes for Clustering with General Norm ObjectivesFateme Abbasi, Sandip Banerjee, Jaroslaw Byrka, Parinya Chalermsook et al.FOCS 2023 · 8 citations
- Generalized Unrelated Machine Scheduling ProblemShichuan Deng, Jian Li, Yuval RabaniSODA 2023 · 3 citations
- Online and Bandit Algorithms Beyond ℓp NormsThomas Kesselheim, Marco Molinaro, Sahil SinglaSODA 2023 · 2 citations
- Supermodular Approximation of Norms and ApplicationsThomas Kesselheim, Marco Molinaro, Sahil SinglaSTOC 2024
Related papers
- Approximating Matroid Basis Testing for Partition Matroids using Budget-In-ExpectationLisa Hellerstein, Benedikt M. Plank, Kevin SchewiorSODA 2026
- Best of Both Worlds: Practical and Theoretically Optimal Submodular Maximization in ParallelYixin Chen, Tonmoy Dey, Alan KuhnleNeurIPS 2021 · 21 citations
- Practical Parallel Algorithms for Submodular Maximization Subject to a Knapsack Constraint with Nearly Optimal AdaptivityShuang Cui, Kai Han, Jing Tang, He Huang et al.AAAI 2023 · 8 citations
- Submodular Maximization subject to a Knapsack Constraint: Combinatorial Algorithms with Near-optimal Adaptive ComplexityGeorgios Amanatidis, Federico Fusco, Philip Lazos, Stefano Leonardi et al.ICML 2021 · 18 citations
- The Adaptive Complexity of Maximizing a Gross Substitutes ValuationRon Kupfer, Sharon Qian, Eric Balkanski, Yaron SingerNeurIPS 2020 · 4 citations
