Exploring the Social Influence of Virtual Humans Unintentionally Conveying Conflicting Emotions
Zubin Datta Choudhary, Nahal Norouzi, Austin Erickson, Ryan Schubert, Gerd Bruder, Gregory F. Welch
Abstract
The expression of human emotion is integral to social interaction, and in virtual reality it is increasingly common to develop virtual avatars that attempt to convey emotions by mimicking these visual and aural cues, i.e. the facial and vocal expressions. However, errors in (or the absence of) facial tracking can result in the rendering of incorrect facial expressions on these virtual avatars. For example, a virtual avatar may speak with a happy or unhappy vocal inflection while their facial expression remains otherwise neutral. In circumstances where there is conflict between the avatar's facial and vocal expressions, it is possible that users will incorrectly interpret the avatar's emotion, which may have unintended consequences in terms of social influence or in terms of the outcome of the interaction. In this paper, we present a human-subjects study (N = 22) aimed at understanding the impact of conflicting facial and vocal emotional expressions. Specifically we explored three levels of emotional valence (unhappy, neutral, and happy) expressed in both visual (facial) and aural (vocal) forms. We also investigate three levels of head scales (down-scaled, accurate, and up-scaled) to evaluate whether head scale affects user interpretation of the conveyed emotion. We find significant effects of different multimodal expressions on happiness and trust perception, while no significant effect was observed for head scales. Evidence from our results suggest that facial expressions have a stronger impact than vocal expressions. Additionally, as the difference between the two expressions increase, the less predictable the multimodal expression becomes. For example, for the happy-looking and happy-sounding multimodal expression, we expect and see high happiness rating and high trust, however if one of the two expressions change, this mismatch makes the expression less predictable. We discuss the relationships, implications, and guidelines for social applications that aim to leverage multimodal social cues.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- Revisiting Distance Perception with Scaled Embodied Cues in Social Virtual RealityZubin Datta Choudhary, Matthew Gottsacker, Kangsoo Kim, Ryan Schubert et al.IEEE VR 2021 · 21 citations
- Virtual Big Heads: Analysis of Human Perception and Comfort of Head Scales in Social Virtual RealityZubin Datta Choudhary, Kangsoo Kim, Ryan Schubert, Gerd Bruder et al.IEEE VR 2020 · 6 citations
- Raise Your Eyebrows Higher: Facilitating Emotional Communication in Social Virtual Reality Through Region-Specific Facial Expression ExaggerationXueyang Wang, Sheng Zhao, Yihe Wang, Howard Ziyu Han et al.CHI 2025 · 11 citations
- Let's Face It: Influence of Facial Expressions on Social Presence in Collaborative Virtual RealitySimon Kimmel, Frederike Jung, Andrii Matviienko, Wilko Heuten et al.CHI 2023 · 62 citations
- Enhancing Social Experiences in Immersive Virtual Reality with Artificial Facial MimicryAlessandro Visconti, Davide Calandra, Federica Giorgione, Fabrizio LambertiIEEE VR 2025 · 11 citations
