Constrained Update Projection Approach to Safe Policy Optimization
Long Yang, Jiaming Ji, Juntao Dai, Linrui Zhang, Binbin Zhou, Pengfei Li, Yaodong Yang, Gang Pan
Abstract
Safe reinforcement learning (RL) studies problems where an intelligent agent has to not only maximize reward but also avoid exploring unsafe areas. In this study, we propose CUP, a novel policy optimization method based on Constrained Update Projection framework that enjoys rigorous safety guarantee. Central to our CUP development is the newly proposed surrogate functions along with the performance bound. Compared to previous safe RL methods, CUP enjoys the benefits of 1) CUP generalizes the surrogate functions to generalized advantage estimator (GAE), leading to strong empirical performance. 2) CUP unifies performance bounds, providing a better understanding and interpretability for some existing algorithms; 3) CUP provides a non-convex implementation via only first-order optimizers, which does not require any strong approximation on the convexity of the objectives. To validate our CUP method, we compared CUP against a comprehensive list of safe RL baselines on a wide range of tasks. Experiments show the effectiveness of CUP both in terms of reward and safety constraint satisfaction. We have opened the source code of CUP at this link https://github.com/zmsn-2077/ CUP-safe-rl .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d08a0f64-35dc-4b8b-bfda-204e136f3ddbCited by top-tier papers18
- Imitate the Good and Avoid the Bad: An Incremental Approach to Safe Reinforcement LearningHuy Hoang, Tien Mai, Pradeep VarakanthamAAAI 2024 · 8 citations
- Safety through feedback in Constrained RLShashank Reddy Chirra, Pradeep Varakantham, Praveen ParuchuriNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- Flipping-based Policy for Chance-Constrained Markov Decision ProcessesXun Shen, Shuo Jiang, Akifumi Wachi, Kazumune Hashimoto et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
- Safe In-Context Reinforcement LearningAmir Moeini, Minjae Kwon, Alper Bozkurt, Yuichi Motai et al.ICML 2026 · 4 citations
- Safe Reinforcement Learning using Finite-Horizon Gradient-based EstimationJuntao Dai, Yaodong Yang, Qian Zheng, Gang PanICML 2024 · 3 citations
Builds on7
- Projection-Based Constrained Policy OptimizationTsung-Yen Yang, Justinian Rosca, Karthik Narasimhan, Peter J. RamadgeICLR 2020 · 306 citations
- First Order Constrained Optimization in Policy SpaceYiming Zhang, Quan Vuong, Keith W. RossNeurIPS 2020 · 238 citations
- IPO: Interior-Point Policy Optimization under ConstraintsYongshuai Liu, Jiaxin Ding, Xin LiuAAAI 2020 · 231 citations
- Constrained Markov Decision Processes via Backward Value FunctionsHarsh Satija, Philip Amortila, Joelle PineauICML 2020 · 58 citations
- Conservative Safety Critics for ExplorationHomanga Bharadhwaj, Aviral Kumar, Nicholas Rhinehart, Sergey Levine et al.ICLR 2021 · 32 citations
Related papers
- SafeMPO: Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Probabilistic Incremental ImprovementAlexander Mattick, Dominik Seuß, Christopher MutschlerICLR 2026
- Multi-Agent First Order Constrained Optimization in Policy SpaceYoupeng Zhao, Yaodong Yang, Zhenbo Lu, Wengang Zhou et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 12 citations
- Constrained Variational Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement LearningZuxin Liu, Zhepeng Cen, Vladislav Isenbaev, Wei Liu et al.ICML 2022 · 112 citations
- Iterative Reachability Estimation for Safe Reinforcement LearningMilan Ganai, Zheng Gong, Chenning Yu, Sylvia L. Herbert et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 56 citations
- Safe Exploration in Reinforcement Learning: A Generalized Formulation and AlgorithmsAkifumi Wachi, Wataru Hashimoto, Xun Shen, Kazumune HashimotoNeurIPS 2023 · 38 citations
