DEBATE, TRAIN, EVOLVE: Self-Evolution of Language Model Reasoning

Large language models (LLMs) have improved significantly in their reasoning through extensive training on massive datasets. However, relying solely on additional data for improvement is becoming increasingly impractical, highlighting the need for models to autonomously enhance their reasoning without external supervision. In this paper, we propose DEBATE, TRAIN, EVOLVE (DTE), a novel ground truthfree training framework that uses multi-agent debate traces to evolve a single language model. We also introduce a new prompting strategy REFLECT-CRITIQUE-REFINE, to improve debate quality by explicitly instructing agents to critique and refine their reasoning. Extensive evaluations on seven reasoning benchmarks with six open-weight models show that our DTE framework achieve substantial improvements, with an average accuracy gain of 8.92% on the GSM-PLUS dataset. Furthermore, we observe strong cross-domain generalization, with an average accuracy gain of 5.8% on all other benchmarks, suggesting that our method captures general reasoning capabilities. Our framework code and trained models are publicly available at https://github.com/ctrlgaurav/Debate-Train-Evolve .